2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-013-0743-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SWAT modeling with uncertainty and cluster analyses of tillage impacts on hydrological processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where J opt denotes the minimum objective function value (achieved for each calibration), n is the number of observations, p is the number of calibrated parameters, and F α,p,n−p denotes the value of the F-distribution given α = 0.05 and the degree of freedom, p and n-p 58,59 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where J opt denotes the minimum objective function value (achieved for each calibration), n is the number of observations, p is the number of calibrated parameters, and F α,p,n−p denotes the value of the F-distribution given α = 0.05 and the degree of freedom, p and n-p 58,59 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If P < 0.05, it indicated that the distribution of the short-term parameter estimate was significantly different from that of the long-term parameter. where J opt denotes the minimum objective function value (achieved for each calibration), n is the number of observations, p is the number of calibrated parameters, and F α,p,n−p denotes the value of the F-distribution given α = 0.05 and the degree of freedom, p and n – p 58 , 59 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using SWATopt, we estimated 39 parameters (Supporting Information Table S3) governing the hydrologic and water quality processes in SWAT. These parameters were selected based on the sensitivity analyses in previous studies (Abbaspour et al, 2007;Baskaran et al, 2010;Bekele & Nicklow, 2007;Santhi et al, 2001;Wang, Barber, Chen, & Wu, 2014;Wu & Liu, 2012). Generally, these parameters were calibrated step by step.…”
Section: Swatopt Model Calibration and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prediction of yield or nitrate leaching at a larger scale has to rely on some successful mathematical formulas (Qiu et al, 2011). Some models based on hydrology are commonly used to predict nutrient loadings in watershed scale, such as SWAT (Wang et al, 2014a) and MIKE SHE (Vansteenkiste et al, 2013). There are also several nutrient-loading prediction models, which include components to simulate not only hydrological processes but also nutrient transport and transformation, such as the Denitrification-Decomposition (DNDC) model (Deng et al, 2011) and STICS soil-crop model (Jego et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%