Oxford Handbooks Online 2016
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199325818.013.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SWB as a Measure of Individual Well-Being

Abstract: There is much discussion about using subjective well-being measures as inputs into a social welfare function, which will tell us how well societies are doing. But we have (many) more than one measure of subjective well-being. This chapter considers examples of three of the main types (life satisfaction, affect, and eudaimonia) in three European surveys. These are quite strongly correlated with each other, and are correlated with explanatory variables in pretty much the same manner. The chapter provides an over… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
3
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparative of the results from ordinal and cardinal estimation typically yield very similar results: see Ferrer-I Carbonell and Frijters [2004] and Clark [2015]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…A comparative of the results from ordinal and cardinal estimation typically yield very similar results: see Ferrer-I Carbonell and Frijters [2004] and Clark [2015]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…I thank the referee for pointing this out. However, Clark (2016) shows that happiness and life satisfaction are strongly correlated in a sample of 25 European countries (the correlation coefficient of 0.71), while the determinants of happiness and life satisfaction are almost perfectly correlated with the correlation coefficient equal to 0.95. 1 3…”
Section: The Polish Social Diagnosis Surveymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Which way of measuring well‐being is the best? There is no simple way of answering this question, but research has shown that life satisfaction, measures of recent positive and negative emotions (or “affect”) and eudaimonic measures (that reflect notions of mastery, relations with others, self‐acceptance and purpose) are reasonably similar, especially in terms of how they are related to a standard set of explanatory variables (Clark, ). But they are not the same.…”
Section: Current and Future Frontlinesmentioning
confidence: 99%