1998
DOI: 10.1093/sf/76.3.747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sweet Mothers and Gangbangers: Managing Crime in a Black Middle-Class Neighborhood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
114
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
114
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In these circumstances, Wilson argues, social integration may serve to disseminate problematic behavior. Drawing on Pattillo (1998) and Pattillo-McCoy (1999), and Venkatesh (1997), Browning et al (2004) demonstrate that social network interaction and exchange limit the effectiveness of neighborhood social control orientations in regulating the prevalence of crime. In this “negotiated coexistence” model, when social interaction and exchange are rooted in high levels of neighborhood social integration, close-knit social ties may come into conflict with generalized expectations for informal social control.…”
Section: The Origins Of Neighborhood Social Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In these circumstances, Wilson argues, social integration may serve to disseminate problematic behavior. Drawing on Pattillo (1998) and Pattillo-McCoy (1999), and Venkatesh (1997), Browning et al (2004) demonstrate that social network interaction and exchange limit the effectiveness of neighborhood social control orientations in regulating the prevalence of crime. In this “negotiated coexistence” model, when social interaction and exchange are rooted in high levels of neighborhood social integration, close-knit social ties may come into conflict with generalized expectations for informal social control.…”
Section: The Origins Of Neighborhood Social Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this “negotiated coexistence” model, when social interaction and exchange are rooted in high levels of neighborhood social integration, close-knit social ties may come into conflict with generalized expectations for informal social control. For instance, interpersonal obligations may limit inclinations to sanction criminal or delinquent behavior (e.g., when residents choose not to call the police when they observe a close neighbor’s child engaging in criminal behavior [Pattillo 1998]).…”
Section: The Origins Of Neighborhood Social Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars such as Kornhauser (1978) and Sampson (1988) articulated theoretical models linking variation in levels of intra-neighborhood informal social ties with the collective capacity to achieve pro-social behavioral health outcomes for youth. Yet empirical findings on the benefits of social networks for neighborhood crime and youth wellbeing have been mixed (Bellair, 1997; Pattillo, 1998; Browning, Feinberg, & Dietz 2004). Additionally, community network studies suggest most strong social ties maintained by contemporary urban residents extend beyond the local neighborhood (Fischer, 1982; Wellman, 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But recent empirical research has found mixed support for the claim that dense, closely tied informal social networks yield benefits for neighborhood residents (Bellair & Browning, 2010; Bellair, 1997; Browning, Dietz, & Feinberg, 2004; Pattillo, 1998). Consequently, questions regarding the extent and nature of neighborhood social network influence on youth well-being remain unsettled.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is often observed among gang members or drug dealers, the studied group members desperately wanted to ensure that their younger relatives would not become involved in the same clandestine world. 30 At the same time, their concern for the younger generation was not only reflected in their attempts to prevent them from engaging in crime, but was also transparent in many other facets of life, such as caring about their citizenship status, their relationships, their educational attainment, or their occupational opportunities.…”
Section: Me: But What Does This Have To Do With Your Criminal Record mentioning
confidence: 99%