Sweet Talk: A Qualitative Study Exploring Attitudes towards Sugar, Sweeteners and Sweet-Tasting Foods in the United Kingdom

Abstract

Worldwide initiatives currently aim to reduce free sugar intakes, but success will depend on consumer attitudes towards sugar and the alternatives. This work aimed to explore attitudes towards sugar, sweeteners and sweet-tasting foods, towards consumption and related policies, in a sample of the general public of the UK. Focus groups and interviews were conducted with 34 adults (7 males, ages: 18–65 years). Thematic analysis identified six themes: ‘Value’ (e.g., pleasure, emotions), ‘Angle’ (e.g., disinterest), ‘Personal Relevance’ (to be concerned and/or change one’s own behavior), ‘Personal Responsibility’ (one has an active relationship with these food items), ‘Understanding’ (the acquisition, comprehension and application of information) and ‘It’s Not Up to Me’ (a passive approach, because intake is subjected to other factors). Both positive and negative attitudes towards sugar, sweeteners and sweet-tasting foods were expressed in all themes. Participants also reported varied engagement with and motivations towards all food items, with implications for intakes. Suggested challenges and potential strategies for reducing free sugar intakes highlighted the need for differing approaches. Future work should assess associations between attitudes and intakes. For greatest population benefit, evidence of the dominant attitudes in those in greatest need of reduced free sugar intakes would be of value.

Consumer Perception of Innovative Fruit and Cereal Bars—Current and Future Perspectives

“…Less interest in purchasing a fruit and cereal bar with health-promoting properties was found when the sugar content of the product was reduced, even though such a modification was one of the most expected by respondents. These results indicate that although respondents declared that they expected such changes, they were not ready to purchase such products, perhaps because they still associate bars with a “sweet snack” and, as indicated by [ 52 ], this may be due to consumers being used to the sweet taste and not being willing to change their habits. It is noted that the snack industry, meeting the expectations of consumers as well as doctors and nutritionists, is looking for innovative alternatives to the sugar-reduced cereal bar.…”

Effects of front-of-package caffeine and sweetener disclaimers in Mexico: cross-sectional results from the 2020 International Food Policy Study

“…Although research on the health impacts of artificial sweeteners is novel, evidence has consistently questioned their safety for children (10)(11)(12)(13) and, more recently, for adults (14) . Studies among adults (31) , parents (32,33) and children (33) have suggested that sweeteners are generally perceived as unhealthful due to their synthetic origin, carcinogenic and addictive potential. In line with these perceptions, our data showed that a high proportion of adults and adolescents believed children should not consume products with sweeteners.…”

Analysis of Recipes Shared as ‘Healthy’ in a Popular Brazilian Website: A Cross-Sectional Study

“…However, evidence on the negative health effects of artificial sweeteners’ intake is accumulating, such as the association with cardiovascular disease and mortality [ 59 ], and with increased cancer risk [ 60 ]. Unfortunately, many in the general public still adopt the use of sweeteners as a short-term strategy to reduce dietary sugar and for weight management [ 61 ].…”