2012
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/753/1/77
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Swift J2058.4+0516: Discovery of a Possible Second Relativistic Tidal Disruption Flare?

Abstract: We report the discovery by the Swift hard X-ray monitor of the transient source Swift J2058.4+0516 (Sw J2058+05). Our multi-wavelength follow-up campaign uncovered a long-lived (duration months), luminous X-ray (L X,iso ≈ 3 × 10 47 erg s −1 ) and radio (νL ν,iso ≈ 10 42 erg s −1 ) counterpart. The associated optical emission, however, from which we measure a redshift of 1.1853, is relatively faint, and this is not due to a large amount of dust extinction in the host galaxy. Based on numerous similarities with … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
58
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 312 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
3
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of Swift J1644+57, Zauderer et al (2011) andBerger et al (2012) inferred Γ ≈ 2.2. Cenko et al (2012) find that Γ 2.1 is required in Swift J2058+05. In both cases, the observed spectrum can be explain by both internal dissipation and Compton drag (see, e.g., Bloom et al 2011).…”
Section: Dissipation and Emission Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In the case of Swift J1644+57, Zauderer et al (2011) andBerger et al (2012) inferred Γ ≈ 2.2. Cenko et al (2012) find that Γ 2.1 is required in Swift J2058+05. In both cases, the observed spectrum can be explain by both internal dissipation and Compton drag (see, e.g., Bloom et al 2011).…”
Section: Dissipation and Emission Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…A few TDE candidates were found in X-ray data from ROSAT (Komossa & Bade 1999;Donley et al 2002;Halpern et al 2004), Chandra , and XMM-Newton (Esquej et al 2007); in γ -ray and X-ray data from Swift (Bloom et al 2011;Burrows et al 2011;Levan et al 2011;Zauderer et al 2011;Cenko et al 2012); in UV data from GALEX (Gezari et al 2006;Gezari et al 2009); and in optical data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS 26 ;van Velzen et al 2011). The high-energy emission is associated with a jet pointing in our line of sight, while the soft X-ray/UV-optical flare is usually identified with thermal emission coming from an accretion flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relativistic outflows and possibly magnetic acceleration are features that GRBs, active galactic nuclei (AGNs), and microquasars have in common. Stellar tidal disruption by a massive BH is also likely to produce a relativistic jet (Bloom et al 2011;Burrows et al 2011;Levan et al 2011;Zauderer et al 2011;Cenko 2012). By studying and comparing the properties of these objects, we could gain an insight into the processes that govern the formation of relativistic jets (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%