Swimming against the tide: A Canadian qualitative study examining the implementation of a province-wide public health initiative to address health equity

Abstract

BackgroundEffectively addressing the social determinants of health and health equity are critical yet still-emerging areas of public health practice. This is significant for contemporary practice as the egregious impacts of health inequities on health outcomes continue to be revealed. More public health organizations seek to augment internal organizational capacity to address health equity while the evidence base to inform such leadership is in its infancy. The purpose of this paper is to report on findings of a study examining key factors influencing the development and implementation of the social determinants of health public health nurse (SDH-PHN) role in Ontario, Canada.MethodsA descriptive qualitative case study approach examined the first Canadian province-wide initiative to add SDH-PHNs to each public health unit. Data sources were documents and staff from public health units (i.e., SDH-PHNs, Managers, Directors, Chief Nursing Officers, Medical Officers of Health) as well as external stakeholders. Data were collected through 42 individual interviews and 226 documents. Interview data were analyzed using framework analysis methods; Prior’s approach guided document analysis.ResultsThree themes related to the SDH-PHN role implementation were identified: (1) ‘Swimming against the tide’ to lead change as staff navigated ideological tensions, competency development, and novel collaborations; (2) Shifting organizational practice environments impacted by initial role placement and action to structurally embed health equity priorities; and (3) Bridging policy implementation gaps related to local-provincial implementation and reporting expectations.ConclusionsThis study extends our understanding of the dynamic interplay among leadership, change management, ideological tensions, and local-provincial public health policy impacting health equity agendas. Given that the social determinants of health lie outside public health, collaboration with communities, health partners and non-health partners is essential to public health practice for health equity. The study findings have implications for increasing our knowledge and capacity for effective system-wide intervention towards health equity as a critical strategic priority for public health and for broader public policy and community engagement. Appropriate and effective public health leadership at multiple levels and by multiple actors is tantamount to adequately making inroads for health equity.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12939-016-0419-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Social Media Providing an International Virtual Elective Experience for Student Nurses

“…Sport is an excellent public health promoter because of its global common denominators. The posts show what McPherson et al [12] identify as the importance of understanding concepts rather just than factual content. Thinking and posting comments about the wider exponents of health which attract media interest focuses on what has been shown to work and when it is threatened.…”

Examination of the British Columbia influenza prevention policy for healthcare workers: Phase 1 qualitative case study

“…A case study approach with theoretical propositions 21 , 22 recently published elsewhere 23 guided this research. Case studies are generalizable to theoretical propositions, each of which directs attention to something to be examined within the scope of the study.…”

“… 25 Particular attention was paid to: (a) content, not their fixed meaning but a situated or referenced meaning; (b) how they were produced; and (c) how they functioned or were used. 23 Each document was systematically analyzed using a framework that included questions such as: Whose perspective was reflected in the document? How did the document function in terms of the policy implementation events and processes?…”

Values are not enough: qualitative study identifying critical elements for prioritization of health equity in health systems

“…Studies that explicitly consider prioritization of health equity within health systems are limited. However, studies considering factors that support health equity action more generally highlight the role of public health, supportive legislation, leadership, values and understanding, resources, capacity and infrastructure [13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. In their organizational framework for public health equity action, Cohen et al stressed the importance of internal and external organizational values and commitments to health equity as evidenced by supportive resources and infrastructure [17].…”