Gas turbine combustors are used to extract chemical energy from the combustion of fuel in presence of an oxidizer to power turbines. Environmental concerns provide motivation to develop more efficient and less polluting gas turbine engines. To achieve good emission performance, lean burn combustors with low pollutant emissions have been developed. These combustors operate at fuel lean conditions and they can be classified into lean premixed and pre-vaporized (LPP) combustor, where the fuel and oxidizer are premixed and pre-vaporized to form a homogeneous mixture in a dedicated region, premixer, just before the fuel-oxidizer mixture enters the combustion chamber, and lean direct injection (LDI) combustor, where the fuel is directly injected into the flame zone without any premixing with oxidizer [1]. The premixing and pre-vaporizing reduce the residence time, the amount of time the gases are in the combustion chamber. The reduction in residence time reduces the NO x emissions, as the high NO x emissions are produced with a long residence time in the combustion chamber. The flow behavior of non-reacting and reacting flow in a lean premixed swirl combustor, adapted from KAUST experimental rig, has been studied using RANS in the commercial software, Ansys-Fluent. Turbulence is modeled using the two equation realizable k − model and the turbulence-chemistry interaction is modeled by a flamelet generated manifold (FGM) technique. At first, non-reacting flow was simulated in lean premixed swirl combustor. These simulation results were compared to the experiments done by Sabatino et al. [2] and LES work of Maestro et al. [3]. This non-reacting flow solution was used as an initial condition to the reacting flow for a faster convergence of the solution, with methane-air mixture at an equivalence ratio of 0.67. GRI 3.0 mechanism was used for modeling chemistry, which had 325 i chemical equations and 53 species to solve. The reacting flow results were compared with the experiments of Palies et al. [4]. Analyses are conducted to study the effect of swirl number and a cylindrical rod on the non-reacting and reacting flows. Higher axial velocities are observed in reacting flow, when compared to the nonreacting flow, because of the thermal expansion of the gases. Flow reattachment point to the combustion chamber wall after the expansion was moved upstream at high swirl numbers. A central toroidal recirculation zone (CTRZ) was observed from a swirl number, S = 0.52 in the case with a central rod, and from S = 0.54 in the case without a central rod and it helped to stabilize the flame. At low swirl numbers, the central rod, which was in the injection tube, helped the flow and flame to stabilize on top of it. In the absence of this central rod, the flame is lifted off and stabilized at a distance from the burner exit. Also, the flame length was shortened at high swirl numbers. As the swirl number was increased, the CTRZ started to move upstream. This phenomenon with flame flashback was observed from S = 0.7. A very high turbulence ...