2015
DOI: 10.1086/682363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Switch between Morphospecies of Pocillopora Corals

Abstract: Pocillopora corals are the main reef builders in the eastern tropical Pacific. The validity of Pocillopora morphospecies remains under debate because of disagreements between morphological and genetic data. To evaluate the temporal stability of morphospecies in situ, we monitored the shapes of individual colonies in three communities in the southern Gulf of California for 44 months. Twenty-three percent of tagged colonies of Pocillopora damicornis changed to Pocillopora inflata morphology during this time. Thi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous genetic data show that (1) morphospecies identification is an inconsistent predictor of genetic affinities within Porites (Forsman et al ., ), as is the case for many coral morphospecies (Eytan et al ., ; Stefani et al ., ; Prada et al ., ; Paz‐García et al ., ), and (2) eastern Pacific populations of P. lobata are genetically isolated from other regions of the tropical Pacific (Baums et al ., ). Genetic data from these studies (mtDNA and ITS in Forsman et al ., ; microsatellites in Boulay et al ., ) also reveal that colonies morphologically diagnosed as P. lobata include a cryptic species ( P. evermanni ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous genetic data show that (1) morphospecies identification is an inconsistent predictor of genetic affinities within Porites (Forsman et al ., ), as is the case for many coral morphospecies (Eytan et al ., ; Stefani et al ., ; Prada et al ., ; Paz‐García et al ., ), and (2) eastern Pacific populations of P. lobata are genetically isolated from other regions of the tropical Pacific (Baums et al ., ). Genetic data from these studies (mtDNA and ITS in Forsman et al ., ; microsatellites in Boulay et al ., ) also reveal that colonies morphologically diagnosed as P. lobata include a cryptic species ( P. evermanni ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, cryptic species of A. lottini are likely, based on correlated genetic and color pattern differences2122 and male-female pairing on corals, but because the clades have not been formally described, they are not routinely distinguished in ecological studies81123. The most challenging are the coral hosts themselves, because of widespread phenotypic plasticity in response to environmental conditions24, the slow evolution of mitochondrial DNA (e.g 2526 in corals generally.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incongruence between morphological and molecular evidence for species boundaries is common in corals (e.g., Forsman et al, 2009, 2010; Keshavmurthy et al, 2013). Contributing factors include environmental plasticity (e.g., Paz-García et al, 2015) and frequent homoplasy of morphological characters (e.g., Forsman et al, 2009) as well as the slow rate of mitochondrial gene evolution that has made ‘universal’ molecular barcodes such as COI relatively invariant among congeneric species (Huang et al, 2008; McFadden et al, 2011; Shearer & Coffroth, 2008). When barcodes fail to discriminate distinct morphospecies it may be because the markers lack appropriate variation, or, alternatively, because morphological variation within a species has been incorrectly interpreted as evidence of a species boundary (McFadden et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%