2015
DOI: 10.2514/1.g000766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Switched-Gain Guidance for Impact Angle Control Under Physical Constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Obviously, B r is a compact set. Consider the definition of x 2c given by equation (11). A direct calculation gives…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, B r is a compact set. Consider the definition of x 2c given by equation (11). A direct calculation gives…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, studies on homing guidance have dealt with constraints in the angle of impact [3], mostly through the employment of optimal control theory [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Moreover, constraints on the maximum acceleration command are also commonly considered [14,15]. As is wellknown, a seeker is essential to homing guidance systems, which is, however, very expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integral value was calculated from initial engagement conditions and desired impact angle. Based on the same strategy of [19], a few of two-phased BPN (TPBPN) guidance laws were proposed in [20][21][22][23][24][25] for attacking a stationary target. A TPBPN was proposed in [20] based on the bias-shaping method, which can satisfy both the terminal-angle constraint and the FOV limitation to maintain the seeker's lock-on condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two time-varying biases were adopted in [22] to keep the seeker's look angle and to ensure the terminal impact angle, respectively. Along with the thoughts of TPBPN and composite guidance law, Tekin and Erer [23] proposed the PN-gain-switched strategy, which can admit the allowed look angle and acceleration values to meet the demand of impact angle and at the same time, have a relative simple structure for implementation because of the PN form. Based on a two-stage PN guidance law, Ratnoo [24] derived a closed-form solution for the choice of navigation gains to satisfy the look angle and impact angle limit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation