2013
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/22/12/127401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Switching effects in superconductor/ferromagnet/superconductor graphene junctions

Abstract: The Josephson effect in the superconductor/ferromagnet/superconductor (SFS) graphene Josephson junction is studied using the Dirac Bogoliubov-de Gennes (DBdG) formalism. It is shown that the SFS graphene junction drives 0—π transition with the increasing of p = h0L/vFħ, which captures the effects of both the exchange field and the length of the junction; the spin-down current is dominant. The 0 state is stable for p < pc (critical value pc ≈ 0.80) and the π state is stable for p > pc, where the free energy min… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[18][19][20][21][22][23] The charge supercurrent across the junction is mediated by the Andreev bound states formed by the electrons and holes inside the normal segment of the junction. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] As an analogy of the conventional Josephson junction, the SSC Josephson junction can be achieved by a weak link between two SSCs. There are both the spin-conserved and the spinflip reflections at the normal-metal/SSC interface, [3] which are the counterparts of the normal reflection and the Andreev reflection at the normal-metal/superconductor interface, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18][19][20][21][22][23] The charge supercurrent across the junction is mediated by the Andreev bound states formed by the electrons and holes inside the normal segment of the junction. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] As an analogy of the conventional Josephson junction, the SSC Josephson junction can be achieved by a weak link between two SSCs. There are both the spin-conserved and the spinflip reflections at the normal-metal/SSC interface, [3] which are the counterparts of the normal reflection and the Andreev reflection at the normal-metal/superconductor interface, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%