2018
DOI: 10.2147/opth.s150595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Switching from concomitant therapy to tafluprost/timolol fixed combination

Abstract: PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of tafluprost/timolol fixed combination (TTFC).Study designA prospective clinical study.MethodsTwenty-eight patients (28 eyes) with primary open-angle glaucoma, who had used tafluprost and timolol gel for at least 3 months with good adherence, were enrolled. Concomitant administration of tafluprost and timolol was switched to TTFC without a washout period. The intraocular pressure (IOP), blood pressure, pulse rate, and ocular signs were compared between before switchi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, adherence, ocular surface safety, and the usability of ophthalmic solutions were compared before and after switching. In a prior switching study by Inoue et al, involving switch to TTFC from concomitant use of tafluprost and gel-forming timolol solution, IOP was not changed after switching; [16] although that study design was similar to ours, the results differed. The reason for this difference is currently unclear; however, the prior study was conducted in a single clinic, whereas our study was conducted in multiple university hospitals and major hospitals throughout a particular region.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…In addition, adherence, ocular surface safety, and the usability of ophthalmic solutions were compared before and after switching. In a prior switching study by Inoue et al, involving switch to TTFC from concomitant use of tafluprost and gel-forming timolol solution, IOP was not changed after switching; [16] although that study design was similar to ours, the results differed. The reason for this difference is currently unclear; however, the prior study was conducted in a single clinic, whereas our study was conducted in multiple university hospitals and major hospitals throughout a particular region.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…We previously conducted a survey of other eye drop combinations when patients switched from two single-agents of the same ingredients to a combination of eye drops. [13][14][15] Overall, 68.0% patients preferred tafluprost/timolol combination eye drops, 13 82.1% preferred latanoprost/timolol combination eye drops, 14 and 54.8% preferred travoprost/timolol combination eye drops. 15 Their primary reason for preferring compounded eye drops was a reduction in the total number of eye drops required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%