1975
DOI: 10.1086/282999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Switching, Functional Response, and Stability in Predator-Prey Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
127
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
127
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To construct a functional response that incorporates switching between multiple prey species, we follow Oaten and Murdoch (27) and Van Leeuwen et al (7) in modelling a predator's diet such that it incorporates the order in which it encounters and successfully attacks prey. As a simplifying assumption required for analytical tractability, only the last consumed prey is taken into account.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To construct a functional response that incorporates switching between multiple prey species, we follow Oaten and Murdoch (27) and Van Leeuwen et al (7) in modelling a predator's diet such that it incorporates the order in which it encounters and successfully attacks prey. As a simplifying assumption required for analytical tractability, only the last consumed prey is taken into account.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once we know this equilibrium state for given states of the prey populations, we can derive the aggregated intakes of a predator and hence its functional response with respect to all these prey populations. Oaten and Murdoch (27) have proposed a model of multi-species functional responses based on similar ideas, but were unable to derive an explicit expression for the resulting functional response.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, the most frequently used explanations of the sigmoid-like shape of the functional response are: (i) the existence of alternative food (Oaten and Murdoch, 1975b;Akre and Johnson, 1979;Gentleman et al, 2003;Elliott 2004), (ii) refuge for prey (Holling, 1966;Taylor, 1984;Poggiale, 1998;Wang et A c c e p t e d m a n u s c r i p t 21 al., 2009), (iii) learning in food searching by predator (Holling, 1965;Luck et al, 1979;Van Leeuwen et al, 2007). None of them is needed to provide a sigmoid response in model (6).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we make the reasonable assumption that a search image would be formed for the more abundant prey type, this leads to a disproportionally high predation rate on the more abundant prey type and, thus, to prey switching (Murdoch, 1969;Oaten and Murdoch, 1975;Van Leeuwen et al, 2007). Search images cause prey switching by a predator, which leads to coexistence between prey species even if the prey species are in direct competition (Murdoch, 1969), such behaviour could also lead to polymorphism in prey species (Allen et al, 1998;Bond and Kamil, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%