Introduction
Diacyglycerol kinase δ isozyme (DGKδ) plays critical roles in lipid signaling by phosphorylating diacylglycerol (DG) into phosphatidic acid (PA). DGKδ regulates a wide variety of physiological and pathological events, such as type II diabetes and obsessive compulsive disorder. Because DGK is one of the components of phosphatidylinositol (PI) turnover, it is thought that DGKδ also utilizes mainly 18:0/20:4‐DG (X:Y; the total number of carbon atoms: the total number of double bonds) derived from PI turnover. Interestingly, we recently demonstrated that DGKδ preferably metabolized palmitic acid (16:0)‐containing DG molecular species, but not arachidonic acid (20:4)‐containing DG species, in response to high glucose stimulation. However, it is still unclear what kind of DG‐generating enzyme provides palmitic acid‐containing DG species.
Sphingomyelin synthase (SMS) 1, SMS2 and SMS‐related protein (SMSr) are DG‐generating enzymes utilizing phosphatidylcholine/phosphatidylethanolamine and ceramide. SMS1 and SMSr contain a sterile α motif domain (SAM), which is a protein‐protein interaction module, at their N‐termini. DGKδ also possesses SAM at its C‐terminus, and DGKδ‐SAM is highly homologous to SMSr‐SAM. Therefore, we hypothesised that DGKδ interacts with SMSr through their SAMs.
In the present study, we investigated the interaction between DGKδ‐SAM and SMSr‐SAM.
Results
We first examined whether DGKδ‐SAM interacts with SMSr‐SAM by immunoprecipitation analysis. We found that SMSr‐SAM, but not SMS1‐SAM, was co‐immunoprecipitated with DGKδ‐SAM. Full‐length DGKδ (DGKδ‐FL) was also co‐immunoprecipitated with SMSr‐FL more strongly than with SMS1‐FL and with SMS2‐FL. To examine whether SMSr‐SAM contribute to the interaction, we performed immunoprecipitation analysis using SMSr‐FL and a SAM‐deletion mutant (SMSr‐DSAM). DGKδ‐FL was strongly co‐immunoprecipitated with SMSr, whereas SMSr‐DSAM only weakly interacted with DGKδ‐FL. Immunostaining analysis demonstrated that DGKδ‐FL co‐localized partly with SMSr‐FL in COS‐7 cells overexpressing these proteins. These results strongly suggest that DGKδ interacts with SMSr through their SAMs.
Conclusion
In summary, the present study for the first time showed that DGKδ interacted with SMSr mainly through their SAMs. It is possible that SMSr is one of the candidates of up stream DG‐providing enzymes of DGKδ, which composes a new pathway independent of PI turnover.
Support or Funding Information
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Number JP18J20003) and supported in part by Venture Business Laboratory in Chiba University (Nanohana Competition 2018 Award).
This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.