IGARSS 2018 - 2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2018
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2018.8517385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Swot Mission Performance and Error Budget

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SWOT correlated errors, to a large part specific to the satellite and instrument design (Peral and Esteban-Fernandez 2018), are particularly challenging for the mapping of altimetry because they can present significant amplitudes but cannot be easily filtered out using conventional filters. Hopefully, these strong spatially correlated errors are expected to have a much lower signature on j than on SSH (Gómez-Navarro et al 2018).…”
Section: Observational Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SWOT correlated errors, to a large part specific to the satellite and instrument design (Peral and Esteban-Fernandez 2018), are particularly challenging for the mapping of altimetry because they can present significant amplitudes but cannot be easily filtered out using conventional filters. Hopefully, these strong spatially correlated errors are expected to have a much lower signature on j than on SSH (Gómez-Navarro et al 2018).…”
Section: Observational Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described in the document of SWOT error budget (Peral and Esteban-Fernandez, 2018), there are various error sources, including systematic error, random noise, and media error. The details can be found at "https://swot.jpl.nasa.gov/resources/ documents/".…”
Section: "Guanlan" Observation Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking "Guanlan" mission as an example (Chen et al, 2019), the effective swath in the cross-track direction is between 15 km to 100 km. Based on the HEBR and HEBL calculation model in (Peral and Esteban-Fernandez, 2018), 0.1 mm baseline length error would bring about 8.4 cm range error on the outer edges of the swath. Generally, a roll error of only 1/3,600 deg (1arcsec) will result in a height error of 48 cm on the outer edge position of 100 km.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This unprecedented set of measurements would allow characterization of ocean mesoscale and sub-mesoscale dynamic processes [9][10][11] that are crucial to understanding and quantifying the exchange of energy between ocean layers and their impact on local and global carbon and energy budgets as well as nutrient transport [12,13]. The primary instrument on board the SWOT observatory enabling this unique set of measurements is KaRIn [14,15], a Ka-band (35 GHz) near-nadir radar interferometer capable of measuring sea-surface height with centimetric accuracy at kilometer scale resolutions [16], complemented with a nadir altimeter [17], GPS and DORIS [18] receivers and a three-frequency radiometer [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%