“…Kandel et al (2006) found that the inter-letter duration was longer when a bigram (e.g., ac) corresponds to a syllabic boundary (e.g., tra.ceur) 1 than when this is not the case (e.g., trac.tus). Similar results have been reported with different types of tasks (dictation, copying, picture naming), in both upper and lower-case handwriting, in typewriting and in several alphabetic languages (Alvarez et al, 2009;Bogearts et al, 1996;Hess et al, 2019;Kandel, et al, 2006Kandel, et al, , 2011Kreiner et al, 2008;Sausset et al, 2012Sausset et al, , 2013Service & Turpeinen, 2001;Weingerten et al, 2004;Zesiger et al, 1994). A conception based on parallel processing at the central and peripheral levels (e.g., Kandel et al, 2011;Olive, 2014;Roux et al, 2013) makes it possible to account for syllabic boundary effects.…”