2012 International Conference on Audio, Language and Image Processing 2012
DOI: 10.1109/icalip.2012.6376657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Syllable category based short utterance speaker recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A systematic combination of SUVN with LDA and source-normalised (SN)-LDA was further used effectively. Moreover, an alternative approach was introduced using PLDA to directly model the SUV which showed that for the combination of [44] performance evaluation JFA, i-vector CSS, WCCN, LDA, NAP, SDNAP, GPLDA [7] calibration evaluation linear calibration, cosine kernel, normalised cosine kernel 2012 [80] performance evaluation inclusion of short utterances in development data-set [51] performance evaluation an ad hoc fusion system of different TV spaces [81] evaluation of phoneme effects adding phonetic information, WCCN and EFR [82] adding of phonetic information VCs, UBVCM [83] adding of syllable information syllable categories, universal background syllable models 2013 [49] analysis on phoneme distribution score calibration with log duration as QMF, synthetic i-vectors [84] analysis of phonetic content TD-ASV, multiple enrolment, used speaker and phonetic content [85] analysis on confusion errors finding speaker-specific phonemes, formulate text using unique phonemes [21] analysis on score calibration QMFs, stacked scores, shared scaling, extrapolation [86] performance analysis TV, PLDA [87] source and utterance -dur. norm.…”
Section: I-vector Estimation and Normalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A systematic combination of SUVN with LDA and source-normalised (SN)-LDA was further used effectively. Moreover, an alternative approach was introduced using PLDA to directly model the SUV which showed that for the combination of [44] performance evaluation JFA, i-vector CSS, WCCN, LDA, NAP, SDNAP, GPLDA [7] calibration evaluation linear calibration, cosine kernel, normalised cosine kernel 2012 [80] performance evaluation inclusion of short utterances in development data-set [51] performance evaluation an ad hoc fusion system of different TV spaces [81] evaluation of phoneme effects adding phonetic information, WCCN and EFR [82] adding of phonetic information VCs, UBVCM [83] adding of syllable information syllable categories, universal background syllable models 2013 [49] analysis on phoneme distribution score calibration with log duration as QMF, synthetic i-vectors [84] analysis of phonetic content TD-ASV, multiple enrolment, used speaker and phonetic content [85] analysis on confusion errors finding speaker-specific phonemes, formulate text using unique phonemes [21] analysis on score calibration QMFs, stacked scores, shared scaling, extrapolation [86] performance analysis TV, PLDA [87] source and utterance -dur. norm.…”
Section: I-vector Estimation and Normalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown that vowels contained significant speaker discriminative information, which remained placid when vowels categorisation was deployed. A similar approach but with syllable category‐based SV in short utterance was conducted in [83].…”
Section: Research In Asv On Short Utterancesmentioning
confidence: 99%