2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1803.05649
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sylvester Normalizing Flows for Variational Inference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with familiar generative models, such as VAE and GAN, normalizing flows represent another generative family that has existed for a long time but only becomes popular in recent years. Normalizing flows have many types of implementation, such as planar flows [35], [36], autoregressive models [37], [38], coupling-based flows [39], [40], [41], and continuous flows [42], [43]. Dinh et al [39] introduced a coupling method to enable highly expressive transformations for flows, and this idea is further improved in [40], [41], [44].…”
Section: Normalizing Flows In Point Cloud Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with familiar generative models, such as VAE and GAN, normalizing flows represent another generative family that has existed for a long time but only becomes popular in recent years. Normalizing flows have many types of implementation, such as planar flows [35], [36], autoregressive models [37], [38], coupling-based flows [39], [40], [41], and continuous flows [42], [43]. Dinh et al [39] introduced a coupling method to enable highly expressive transformations for flows, and this idea is further improved in [40], [41], [44].…”
Section: Normalizing Flows In Point Cloud Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Good performance using normalizing flows requires that the mapping f θ be powerful yet invertible with a Jacobian that can be computed efficiently. There are a number of techniques in the literature to achieve this, e.g., linear mappings, planar/radial flows (Rezende & Mohamed, 2015;Tabak & Turner, 2013), Sylvester flows (Berg et al, 2018), coupling (Dinh et al, 2014) and auto-regressive models (Larochelle & Murray, 2011). One may also compose the transformations, e.g., using monotonic mappings f θ in each layer (Huang et al, 2018;De Cao et al, 2019).…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There Finally, there are also several works which develop new techniques for constructing NFs that are orthogonal to ours (Tomczak & Welling, 2017;Gemici et al, 2016;Duvenaud et al, 2016;Berg et al, 2018).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%