Symbiosis across institutional logics in a social enterprise

Abstract

Purpose Non-profit organisations are moving from being permeated with social institutional logics to becoming increasingly influenced by market logics. These organisations thereby have to cope with multiple, often conflicting, logics. The existing literature on hybrid organisations has investigated the consequences of multiple logics, focussing in particular on the conflicts and power struggles between the agents of different logics. This paper aims to examine a social enterprise (SE), which in recent years has experienced a shift towards market logics while being firmly grounded in a non-profit social logic. Design/methodology/approach This paper is a qualitative, single-case case study of a SE based on interviews and observations. Findings The paper investigates how this hybrid organisation experienced and responded to an organisational environment marked by multiple institutional logics. Unlike the subjects of many previous studies, the organisation managed to accommodate and assemble the logics in an unproblematic symbiosis. A strong ideological congruence across institutional logics appears to play the main role in spanning the boundaries between institutional logics. Furthermore, organisational structures advocating decentralisation, autonomy and transparency appear to be important facilitators of the integration of diverse logics. Originality/value This paper contributes to the literature on hybrid organisations and SEs and aids practitioners in such organisations. It suggests that organisational decentralisation, autonomy and transparency facilitate the integration of multiple logics – especially if ideological congruence exists between the actors of different institutional logics. The findings indicate that ideological congruence enhances tolerance towards different approaches and increases the willingness to integrate diverse logics.

Balancing dual missions for social venture growth: a comparative case study

“…In the selection process, such ventures identify and commit to values held common between missions. Previous research suggested that social ventures should establish a strong ideological congruence across hybrid structures (Maibom and Smith 2016). Our results show that an ideological congruence can be successfully established by selecting common values to forge an overarching, consistent theme within the activities and processes of dual mission management.…”

The evolution of social entrepreneurship research: a bibliometric analysis

“…The ten articles that specifically cover the dual mission character of social enterprises show that, although hybridity became the defining characteristic of these ventures there are ways to deal with it to overcome conflicts, tensions and the complexity it imposes. Actually, some authors suggest that this is an on-going process that must be continuously challenged to achieve a balance of forces that allow the optimum functioning of social enterprises (Kachlami, 2016;Maibom and Smith, 2016;Mazzei, 2017).…”

Embracing entrepreneurial action through effectuation in social enterprise

“…This study used a qualitative research design (Yin, 2013). Specifically, we adopt a single-case study (Maibom and Smith, 2016) approach to gain in-depth access to the multifaceted social data and to identify the idiosyncratic nuances (Mitchell, 1983) and the dynamic presence (Eisenhardt, 1989, p. 524) within the Good-Faith Learning social enterprise. This method is a powerful example (Siggelkow, 2007) and well describes the existence of a phenomenon (Eisenhardt and Graebner, 2007).…”