2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12549-017-0284-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symbiosis in Late Devonian-Mississippian corals: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We interpret that 1424 of the 2118 observations unambiguously represent parasitism (categories 1-3 as defined above) as they coincide with morphological evidence for a clear negative impact on their host during life and a benefit for the parasitic organism based on their position, orientation and mode of life. Host phyla include Arthropoda (17.8% [72,77,78,[81][82][83][84][85]), Brachiopoda (4.8% [38,39,41,[86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93]), Bryozoa (2.0% [94][95][96][97]), Chordata (1.9% [98][99][100][101]), Cnidaria (2.7% [102][103][104][105][106][107][108]), Echinodermata (21.2% [75,[109][110][111][112][113][114][115][116][117]), Hemichordata (1.9% [118]), Mollusca (47.3% [76,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We interpret that 1424 of the 2118 observations unambiguously represent parasitism (categories 1-3 as defined above) as they coincide with morphological evidence for a clear negative impact on their host during life and a benefit for the parasitic organism based on their position, orientation and mode of life. Host phyla include Arthropoda (17.8% [72,77,78,[81][82][83][84][85]), Brachiopoda (4.8% [38,39,41,[86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93]), Bryozoa (2.0% [94][95][96][97]), Chordata (1.9% [98][99][100][101]), Cnidaria (2.7% [102][103][104][105][106][107][108]), Echinodermata (21.2% [75,[109][110][111][112][113][114][115][116][117]), Hemichordata (1.9% [118]), Mollusca (47.3% [76,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has started to change during the last few years, especially in the light of new research approaches that promote the integration between trace and body fossil analyses to identify and qualify ancient symbiotic associations, often based on the detection of skeletal intergrowths and bioclaustration structures (e.g. Yuan et al 2005;Tapanila 2008;Tapanila and Ekdale 2007;Stanley and Schootbrugge 2009;De Baets et al 2015;Wilson 2015, 2016;Vinn et al , 2018Vinn et al , 2019Vinn et al , 2021Vinn 2016Vinn , 2017aRobin et al 2016, Robin 2021Zonneveld et al 2022). Only a few studies, however, have explored the deep past of sea turtle epibiosis based on palaeontological lines of evidence (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%