2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.135843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symbiotic readiness: Factors that interfere with the industrial symbiosis implementation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scientists name the following factors as possible factors for assessing the degree of symbiotic readiness: the possibility of exchanging by-products of activities; the availability of production information about other companies; the availability of infrastructure to ensure symbiotic partnership, etc. [16] To implement industrial symbiosis in the Black Sea region, it is important to identify not only the potential of symbiotic interaction in the region but also the potential of individual enterprises.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scientists name the following factors as possible factors for assessing the degree of symbiotic readiness: the possibility of exchanging by-products of activities; the availability of production information about other companies; the availability of infrastructure to ensure symbiotic partnership, etc. [16] To implement industrial symbiosis in the Black Sea region, it is important to identify not only the potential of symbiotic interaction in the region but also the potential of individual enterprises.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to understand how to value materials, utilities, and by-products formerly considered as waste), collaboration and knowledge sharing among different companies and stakeholders are key enablers for creating symbiotic collaborations (Chertow and Ehrenfeld, 2012;Mortensen and Kørnøv, 2019). The IS paradigm is thus a collaborative CE paradigm, where different companies jointly collaborate to value materials, utilities, and by-products, formerly disposed because considered as waste, with the ultimate objective of closing resources loops (Agudo et al, 2023;Chertow and Ehrenfeld, 2012;Chertow, 2000;Fraccascia, 2019;Herczeg et al, 2018;Neves et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past studies argued conceptual frameworks (Baldassarre et al, 2019;Boons et al, 2017), also aimed at identifying drivers and barriers to the implementation of the IS paradigm (Domenech et al, 2019;Herczeg et al, 2018). Scholars pointed out the benefits stemming from the IS paradigm adoption and performance assessment (Agudo et al, 2023;Fraccascia, 2019;Fraccascia et al, 2021a). Past reviews of the extant literature (Mortensen and Kørnøv, 2019;Neves et al, 2020;Schl€ uter et al, 2022) grounded this research field, also proposing a research agenda for those interested in IS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%