2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2006.tb17913.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symbolic Drawings Reveal Changes in Preservice Teacher Mathematics Attitudes After a Mathematics Methods Course

Abstract: A new method of analyzing mathematics attitudes through symbolic drawings, situated within the field of Jungian‐oriented analytical psychology, was applied to 52 preservice elementary teachers before and after a mathematics methods course. In this triangulation mixed methods design study, pretest images related to past mathematics experiences drawn by prospective teachers were 63.2% negative in tone, and listed associated emotions were 60.4% negative; on the posttest these changed significantly to 72.1% positi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By extension, preservice teachers with higher levels of anxiety generally had lower levels of math teacher self-efficacy (Duane, Giesen, & Swars, 2006). Helping preservice teachers to shift from negative to positive attitudes regarding math may help them to avoid passing their negative outlook on math to their students (Rule & Harrell, 2006). While the development of teacher self-efficacy is generally important because of the impact it has on teacher practices and student outcomes, it may be particularly so for United States (US) teachers at this time.…”
Section: Framing the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By extension, preservice teachers with higher levels of anxiety generally had lower levels of math teacher self-efficacy (Duane, Giesen, & Swars, 2006). Helping preservice teachers to shift from negative to positive attitudes regarding math may help them to avoid passing their negative outlook on math to their students (Rule & Harrell, 2006). While the development of teacher self-efficacy is generally important because of the impact it has on teacher practices and student outcomes, it may be particularly so for United States (US) teachers at this time.…”
Section: Framing the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This aligns with a number of previous research studies. Harrell and Rule (2006) found after taking a mathematics methods course, preservice teachers indicated working with concrete materials or manipulatives was one of the most positive experiences. This may be in part because working with manipulatives and content gave teachers an opportunity to build math concept knowledge, especially for those with poor math skills.…”
Section: Further Reflection and Continuing Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar inferences have been made in the literature (Keklikçi & Yılmazer, 2013;Putwain & Symes, 2011;Hadley & Dorward, 2011;Bates et. al., 2011;Peker & Ertekin, 2011;McGlynn-Stewart, 2010;Bekdemir, 2010;Adnan & Zakarai, 2010;Martino & Zan, 2010;Gresham, 2009;Rule & Harrell, 2006;Özçakır-Sümen, Çağlayan & Kartal, 2015).…”
Section: Results and Interpretations For The Second Research Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This increased perseverance was noted in all three of the assignments that were analysed. In her summary statement, Ellen made a connection to a journal article where the notion of learners developing determination to 'stick with a problem' was discussed (Ollerton, 2009). In referring to developing her own perseverance, Ellen wrote, "this has been a big accomplishment for me".…”
Section: The Centrality Of 'Emotion' In Learning Mathematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%