2012
DOI: 10.1090/s0894-0347-2012-00758-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symbolic dynamics for surface diffeomorphisms with positive entropy

Abstract: Let f f be a C 1 + ε C^{1+\varepsilon } diffeomorphism on a compact smooth surface with positive topological entropy h h . For every 0 > δ > h 0>\delta >h , we construct an invariant Borel set E E and a countable Markov partition for the restriction of f f to E E in such a way that E… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
159
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
159
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First recall we have by Katok's theorem [36] and its noninvertible version [22,49]: Therefore any C ∞ surface diffeomorphism or interval map f is asymptotically Per δ -expansive and satisfies g Per δ ≥ h top (f ) for any 0 < δ < h top (f ). Stronger lower bounds follow from the Markov representations built in [47], [18] and from Gurevic's theory: The main statements of the Introduction follow then directly from Corollary 2.1. A symbolic extension is a topological extension by a subshift over a finite alphabet (a symbolic extension does not need to be Markovian and the extension does not have to be finite-to-one).…”
Section: Local Periodic Growth the Abstract Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…First recall we have by Katok's theorem [36] and its noninvertible version [22,49]: Therefore any C ∞ surface diffeomorphism or interval map f is asymptotically Per δ -expansive and satisfies g Per δ ≥ h top (f ) for any 0 < δ < h top (f ). Stronger lower bounds follow from the Markov representations built in [47], [18] and from Gurevic's theory: The main statements of the Introduction follow then directly from Corollary 2.1. A symbolic extension is a topological extension by a subshift over a finite alphabet (a symbolic extension does not need to be Markovian and the extension does not have to be finite-to-one).…”
Section: Local Periodic Growth the Abstract Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The above results must be compared with the recent work of O. Sarig about the coding of C 1+α surface diffeomorphisms. In [47] he built for any δ > 0 a finite to one topological Markov shift extension of any surface diffeomorphism on a set of full measure for any hyperbolic ergodic measure with Lyapunov exponents δ-away from zero. Then the finite subgraphs of this Markov shift correspond to the hyperbolic sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Suspension constructions (flows and cascades) over countable alphabet Markov shifts turn out to be a powerful tool in the study of some classes of smooth dynamical systems on manifolds [1,2,6,10].…”
Section: Definition 23mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topological (symbolic) Markov shifts, both with finite and countable alphabet, as well as suspen sions with discrete and continuous time over them, that is, suspension automorphisms (cascades) and sus pension flows, have long been important tools for studying many questions of the theory of smooth dynamical systems (see, e.g., [1][2][3][4][5][6]). We are interested in a lower estimate for the entropy of a flow of the type specified above corresponding to an invariant mea sure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%