1992
DOI: 10.1016/0890-5401(92)90017-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symbolic model checking: 1020 States and beyond

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
424
0
5

Year Published

1992
1992
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,587 publications
(429 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
424
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, in Fig. 7, an event signals the completion of a state machine's execution 1. This can be done in SMV by putting the invariant in a TRANS statement.…”
Section: Oblivious Vs Nonoblivious Synchronizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In other words, in Fig. 7, an event signals the completion of a state machine's execution 1. This can be done in SMV by putting the invariant in a TRANS statement.…”
Section: Oblivious Vs Nonoblivious Synchronizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method is impractical for many large systems because of the state-explosion problem. Much more efficient for large state spaces is symbolic model checking, in which the model checker visits the whole set of states at the same time [1].…”
Section: Symbolic Model Checkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations