Symmetric and asymmetric lithospheric extension: Relative effects of frictional‐plastic and viscous strain softening

Abstract

[1] Strain-dependent rheologies may play a critical role in the deformation of the lithosphere and particularly in the development of focused shear zones. We investigate the effects of strain softening on lithospheric extension using plane strain thermomechanical finite element model experiments. Parametric softening is specified as a linear decrease of the effective internal angle of friction, the effective viscosity, or both in the model rheologies. The sensitivity of deformation to the choice of softening parameters is investigated in cases where the crust is either strongly or weakly coupled to the mantle lithosphere. Results are classified according to the symmetry (S) or asymmetry (A) of the deformation of the upper and lower lithosphere during rifting. Strain softening is required for rifting asymmetry but is not always sufficient. A range of model tectonic styles occurs including pure and simple shear modes with focused shear zones. Mode selection is mostly determined by the feedback between two primary controls, the ''dominant'' rheology and the parametric strain-softening mechanisms listed above. Softening of the dominant rheology promotes asymmetric extension of that part of the lithosphere controlled by the dominant rheology. Model results are consistent with the proposed primary controls and the factors that contribute to these controls. In particular, decreasing and increasing the rifting velocity can change the mode by changing the dominant rheology. Asymmetry is strongest in coupled models which include a decrease in the internal angle of friction and have low rifting velocities.

Interaction of crustal heterogeneity and lithospheric processes in determining passive margin architecture on the southern Namibian margin

“…Huismans and Beaumont (2013) predicted that during a rift stage distributed strain, and hence a wide rift basin, would progressively localise onto the rift axis. Although previous studies have demonstrated that this may happen during the continental rift phase (e.g.…”

The rift to break-up evolution of the Gulf of Aden: Insights from 3D numerical lithospheric-scale modelling

“…Many numerical models include these features and have been used to study diverse aspects of rift dynamics in two dimensions (e.g. Zuber and Parmentier, 1986;Braun and Beaumont, 1989;Bassi, 1991;Buck, 1991;Burov and Cloetingh, 1997;Lavier et al, 2000;Behn et al, 2002;van Wijk and Cloetingh 2002;Huismans and Beaumont, 2003;Lavier and Manatschal, 2006;RegenauerLieb et al, 2006;Buiter et al 2008;Beaumont, 2011, Rey et al 2011 ). Despite these advantages, numerical models of oblique rifting intrinsically require computationally expensive calculations in three dimensions.…”

Strain weakening enables continental plate tectonics

“…Strain weakening in the ductile middle crust permits mechanical decoupling between lower crustal flow and upper crust faulting, which is essential to promote localised faulting and large displacement along faults (Lavier and Buck, 2002;Huismans and Beaumont, 2003;Nagel and Buck, 2004;Schueller et al, 2005;Schueller et al, 2010). The absence of weakening in the deep crust yields to a progressive increase of its strength during strain localization so that it becomes the strongest level of the lithosphere, as is indicated by post-seismic creep measurements in California (Bürgmann and Dresen, 2008;Thatcher and Pollitz, 2008).…”