38th Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference 1997
DOI: 10.2514/6.1997-1301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symmetric coupling of Galerkin boundary elements with finite elements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a limiting case and was used to develop the basic formulation of SFEBE. As previously mentioned, the case of non-matching nodes was developed in Reference [34]. The resulting equations are symmetric and just as e$cient as the present SFEBE method.…”
Section: Fracture Problem Using Sfebementioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is a limiting case and was used to develop the basic formulation of SFEBE. As previously mentioned, the case of non-matching nodes was developed in Reference [34]. The resulting equations are symmetric and just as e$cient as the present SFEBE method.…”
Section: Fracture Problem Using Sfebementioning
confidence: 92%
“…As an example, a generic two zone problem can be reexamined. The governing Boundary integral formulation for this type of problem is the SomiGliana's identity [33,34] which is reproduced below:…”
Section: Transforming Boundary Element Subdomains To Equivalent Finitmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The following sections of the paper discuss an approach to FEM-BEM coupling that uses a recently developed symmetric multi-zone (multiple subdomain) BEM method for elastic problems [42,43]. The symmetric Galerkin multi-zone boundary element analysis (SGMZBEA) method can be coupled with a FEM in 2D elastic problems via two approaches.…”
Section: Literature Review On Fem-bem Coupling and Corner Nodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, that type of modelling is not used in the present paper. Here, the problem is solved by changing FEM subdomain to equivalent BEM subdomain [42,44]. This approach is not fully symmetric, but it has block symmetry.…”
Section: Non-matching Node Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%