1998
DOI: 10.1115/1.3098983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symmetric Galerkin Boundary Element Methods

Abstract: This review article concerns a methodology for solving numerically, for engineering purposes, boundary and initial-boundary value problems by a peculiar approach characterized by the following features: the continuous formulation is centered on integral equations based on the combined use of single-layer and double-layer sources, so that the integral operator turns out to be symmetric with respect to a suitable bilinear form. The discretization is performed either on a variational basis or by a Galerkin weight… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
174
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
0
174
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among those, the Symmetric Galerkin BEM (SGBEM) is a conforming method to enforce variable continuity across element boundaries based on shape function like in the finite element method (see e.g. Bonnet et al (1998) for more details). The SGBEM formulation with dis-placement discontinuities as the main variables for the discretization of the fracture have been used to solve for the elastic deformation in some 3D hydraulic fracture simulators (Rungamornrat et al, 2005;Xu and Wong, 2013).…”
Section: Boundary Element Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among those, the Symmetric Galerkin BEM (SGBEM) is a conforming method to enforce variable continuity across element boundaries based on shape function like in the finite element method (see e.g. Bonnet et al (1998) for more details). The SGBEM formulation with dis-placement discontinuities as the main variables for the discretization of the fracture have been used to solve for the elastic deformation in some 3D hydraulic fracture simulators (Rungamornrat et al, 2005;Xu and Wong, 2013).…”
Section: Boundary Element Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the coupled method, the fast marching method maintains the location and motion of the crack front via signed distance functions, whereas the X-FEM is used to compute the local front velocity. In keeping with standard level set notation, we use in three dimensions are: finite element methods [12,13], boundary element-based techniques [14][15][16][17][18][19], and boundary integral equations [20,21]. Gao and Rice [22] and Lai et al [23] used perturbation analysis to study planar and non-planar cracks, whereas Lazarus and coworkers [24][25][26] conducted planar crack growth simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The operation [T n Aφ](x) gives rise to a hypersingular kernel involving a r −3 singularity. After a well-documented regularization process [3,7] involving two integrations by parts over ∂Ω, the resulting SGBIE formulation, on which the present development is based, reads:…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%