Computer Aided Systems Theory – EUROCAST 2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-75867-9_85
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symmetric Optical Flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We then compute the spatial derivatives of the first image, compute the average of these and the corresponding warped derivatives of the second image (cf. Álvarez et al 2007;Horn 1986), and use these in place of…”
Section: Baseline Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then compute the spatial derivatives of the first image, compute the average of these and the corresponding warped derivatives of the second image (cf. Álvarez et al 2007;Horn 1986), and use these in place of…”
Section: Baseline Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We propose to include a truly symmetric flow estimate which is calculated directly using the pixel positions of the unknown frame I1 /2 , to complement the two asymmetric flows. This flow v s is calculated using the reparametrization of (3) first suggested by Alvarez et al 18 , and recently analyzed in a frame interpolation setup by Rakêt et al 2 i.e. replacing the data fidelity term in (3) by…”
Section: Frame Interpolation Algorithm and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar idea was applied to the optical flow problem by Alvarez et al [2], who imposed an additional consistency term. Later that same year Alvarez et al [3] proposed a reparametrization similar to the one derived in this paper in order to avoid a reference frame, and thereby increase flow consistency. However, they did not use the obtained symmetric flow directly, but interpolated flow values at pixel position of a reference image in order to obtain a flow comparable to the standard asymmetric flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Apart from being algorithmically different, the difference between the justification given in this paper and the justifications of Alvarez et al [3] and Chen [4] is that we have chosen the symmetric data fidelity term because it explicitly models the standard interpolation assumption, rather than improves some notion of consistency or better handles large displacements. In turn this also means that we use the estimated flows directly on the unknown frame, and thereby avoid problems of temporal warping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%