2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2011.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symmetric quivers, invariant theory, and saturation theorems for the classical groups

Abstract: Let G denote either a special orthogonal group or a symplectic group defined over the complex numbers. We prove the following saturation result for G: given dominant weights λ 1 , . . . , λ r such that the tensor product V N λ 1 ⊗· · ·⊗V N λ r contains nonzero G-invariants for some N ≥ 1, we show that the tensor product V 2λ 1 ⊗ · · · ⊗ V 2λ r also contains nonzero G-invariants. This extends results of Kapovich-Millson and Belkale-Kumar and complements similar results for the general linear group due to Knutso… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4 of [7]), and for B 2 via the expression (47). 2) One can use (29) (also formula (36) of [7]) that expresses V in terms of a finite number of multiplicities (LR coefficients) and of the constants rκ (defined in sect. 3) associated to g.…”
Section: The Many Ways To Compute the Volume Of A Bz Polytopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 of [7]), and for B 2 via the expression (47). 2) One can use (29) (also formula (36) of [7]) that expresses V in terms of a finite number of multiplicities (LR coefficients) and of the constants rκ (defined in sect. 3) associated to g.…”
Section: The Many Ways To Compute the Volume Of A Bz Polytopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, [KnTa99] adopts the former viewpoint, providing conjectural extensions to other Lie groups. Subsequent work includes [KaMi08,BeKu10,Ku10,Res10,Sa12]; see also the references therein.…”
Section: Introduction and The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was proved by Belkale-Kumar (2010) for the groups SO(2ℓ + 1) and Sp(2ℓ) by using geometric techniques. Sam (2012) proved it for SO(2ℓ) (and also for SO(2ℓ + 1) and Sp(2ℓ)) via the quiver approach (following the proof by Derksen-Weyman (2010) for G = SL(n)). (Observe that the general result of Kapovich-Millson gives a saturation factor of 4 in these cases.…”
Section: Theorem (14) For Any Connected Simple G D = Kmentioning
confidence: 93%