2020
DOI: 10.1214/20-ejp536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symmetric simple exclusion process in dynamic environment: hydrodynamics

Abstract: We consider the symmetric simple exclusion process in Z d with quenched bounded dynamic random conductances and prove its hydrodynamic limit in path space. The main tool is the connection, due to the self-duality of the process, between the invariance principle for single particles starting from all points and the macroscopic behavior of the density field. While the hydrodynamic limit at fixed macroscopic times is obtained via a generalization to the time-inhomogeneous context of the strategy introduced in [41… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will refer to such environments as stationary, strongly reversible Markovian environments; see Section 2 for detailed definitions. This class includes many of the most natural and interesting examples of dynamic RCMs appearing in the literature, including dynamical percolation [26,34,[34][35][36], the simple symmetric exclusion process [7,38,39], and dynamic RCMs in which the conductances evolve according to an SDE such as those arising in the Helffer-Sjöstrand representation of gradient fields, see e.g. [17,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will refer to such environments as stationary, strongly reversible Markovian environments; see Section 2 for detailed definitions. This class includes many of the most natural and interesting examples of dynamic RCMs appearing in the literature, including dynamical percolation [26,34,[34][35][36], the simple symmetric exclusion process [7,38,39], and dynamic RCMs in which the conductances evolve according to an SDE such as those arising in the Helffer-Sjöstrand representation of gradient fields, see e.g. [17,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While for this latter step we follow closely the mild solution approach initiated in [33] and further developed in e.g. [16], [19], [35], to get the desired homogenization result we employ, via a suitable random time change, several concepts and results developed in the context of the random conductance model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[28] and [14]) do not apply in this framework. In [35], in which the hydrodynamic limit of the simple exclusion process in presence of dynamic random conductances is studied, a criterion for relative compactness, based on the notion of uniform stochastic continuity, has been presented. This criterion applies to the simple symmetric exclusion process in both static and dynamic random conductances and, in this paper, we apply it also to our context of partial exclusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations