1994
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/5.2.188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symmetrical male sexual ornaments, paternal care, and offspring quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, since badge size in the collared flycatcher predicts paternal genetic effects on nestling fledgling condition, a character related to fitness (Sheldon et al 1997), female collared flycatchers may have been deceived by the false signalling of high quality by males with enlarged badges. Given such deception, two additional explanations to the reduced male share of feeds in the experimental pairs could be that males with increased badge size may be mated to females of relatively high quality (Darwin 1871;Fisher 1958) and/or to females that may be willing to invest relatively more in their offspring as postulated in the differential allocation hypothesis (Burley (1986), for empirical evidence see Burley (1988), de Lope & Møller (1993 and Møller (1994)). However, I found no differences in aspects of quality such as age, lay date or clutch size between females mated to males from the two treatment groups.…”
Section: Discussion (A) Do Males That Signal Too High a Status Enjoy mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, since badge size in the collared flycatcher predicts paternal genetic effects on nestling fledgling condition, a character related to fitness (Sheldon et al 1997), female collared flycatchers may have been deceived by the false signalling of high quality by males with enlarged badges. Given such deception, two additional explanations to the reduced male share of feeds in the experimental pairs could be that males with increased badge size may be mated to females of relatively high quality (Darwin 1871;Fisher 1958) and/or to females that may be willing to invest relatively more in their offspring as postulated in the differential allocation hypothesis (Burley (1986), for empirical evidence see Burley (1988), de Lope & Møller (1993 and Møller (1994)). However, I found no differences in aspects of quality such as age, lay date or clutch size between females mated to males from the two treatment groups.…”
Section: Discussion (A) Do Males That Signal Too High a Status Enjoy mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Female barn swallows are known to differential feed their offspring when mated to an attractive male (de Lope & Møller, 1993; Møller, 1994c; Saino & Møller, 1995). However, such differential parental investment by females cannot have affected the resemblance between parasite loads of offspring and that of their fathers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such differential parental investment by females cannot have affected the resemblance between parasite loads of offspring and that of their fathers. Male tail length is only known to affect the relative feeding effort of parent barn swallows, but not the total amount of food provisioning by the breeding pair (de Lope & Møller, 1993; Møller, 1994c; Saino & Møller, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four potentially confounding factors were partialled out for both male and female parents: parental tail length, laying date, brood size and experimental treatment. Tail length of male (Møller 1988) and female (Møller 1993) parents is positively related to the number of fledglings and other measures of breeding performance and might also influence offspring quality (but see Møller 1994c). Nestlings born early in the season are more likely to recruit (Møller 1994a), and nestling quality might also be related to laying date, as in the Great Tit Parus major (Daan et al 1989).…”
Section: Study Site and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Short-term obstacle course experiments by Møller (1991a), Evans et al (1994), Swaddle et al (1996) and Swaddle (1997) show evidence for the existence of both direct and indirect effects of FA on bird flight performance. Møller (1992Møller ( , 1994c) manipulated male tail length and FA independently and found that asymmetrical males had decreased annual reproductive success. Females were not manipulated, and both parents adjusted their food provisioning rates, obliterating differences in nestling quality (body mass and tarsus length) between treatment groups (Møller 1994c).…”
Section: Nestling Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%