Philosophy of Physics 2007
DOI: 10.1016/b978-044451560-5/50016-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symmetries and Invariances in Classical Physics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A continuous transformation, as in the case of the Galilean group, admits two interpretations. Under the active interpretation, the transformation corresponds to a change from one system to another-transformed-system; under the passive interpretation, the transformation consists in a change of the viewpoint-reference frame-from which the system is described (see [15]). Nevertheless, in both cases the validity of a group of symmetry transformations expresses the fact that the identity and the behavior of the system are not altered by the application of the transformations: in the active interpretation language, the original and the transformed systems are equivalent; in the passive interpretation language, the original and the transformed reference frames are equivalent.…”
Section: Modal-hamiltonian Interpretation and Boost-transformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A continuous transformation, as in the case of the Galilean group, admits two interpretations. Under the active interpretation, the transformation corresponds to a change from one system to another-transformed-system; under the passive interpretation, the transformation consists in a change of the viewpoint-reference frame-from which the system is described (see [15]). Nevertheless, in both cases the validity of a group of symmetry transformations expresses the fact that the identity and the behavior of the system are not altered by the application of the transformations: in the active interpretation language, the original and the transformed systems are equivalent; in the passive interpretation language, the original and the transformed reference frames are equivalent.…”
Section: Modal-hamiltonian Interpretation and Boost-transformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 The case against Newtonian spacetime is framed in these terms by Maudlin (1993) and Dasgupta (2013). 29 The case against Newtonian spacetime is put this way, for example, in Earman, 1989;Brading and Castellani, 2007;Roberts, 2008;North, 2009;Baker, 2010;andBelot, 2011. 30 North, 2009, contains a detailed discussion of what it means to minimize structure in a physical theory.…”
Section: Philosophy Department Vassar Collegementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case against Newtonian spacetime is put this way, for example, in Earman, ; Brading and Castellani, ; Roberts, ; North, ; Baker, ; and Belot, .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For philosophical introductions to symmetry see the Introduction in[BC03],[BC07],[BC08] and[Ban12]. For a popular introduction to the physical issues see[LH04].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%