2016
DOI: 10.1090/proc/13391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symmetrization and anti-symmetrization in parabolic equations

Abstract: Abstract. We derive some symmetrization and anti-symmetrization properties of parabolic equations. First, we deduce from a result by Jones [6] a quantitative estimate of how far the level sets of solutions are from being spherical. Next, using this property, we derive a criterion providing solutions whose level sets do not converge to spheres for a class of equations including linear equations and Fisher-KPP reaction-diffusion equations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the semilinear case similar results hold when a > 0; see [18,32,47]. When a = 0 one has to distinguish between the so called pushed case, c * > 2h ′ (0), for which we have also analogous results [46,47], and the more involved pulled case, c * = 2h ′ (0), for which there is a logarithmic term (known as Bramson's correction term) in the description of the large-time behaviour of level sets even for N = 1 [8,14,23,27,41,42]. In all cases the first term in this description had been given in [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the semilinear case similar results hold when a > 0; see [18,32,47]. When a = 0 one has to distinguish between the so called pushed case, c * > 2h ′ (0), for which we have also analogous results [46,47], and the more involved pulled case, c * = 2h ′ (0), for which there is a logarithmic term (known as Bramson's correction term) in the description of the large-time behaviour of level sets even for N = 1 [8,14,23,27,41,42]. In all cases the first term in this description had been given in [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Of course, for this question to make sense we have to consider all possible balls, not just the ones centred at the origin. We expect a negative answer, in view of the counterexamples for bistable and concave monostable nonlinearities in the semilinear case given in [42,43,50]. The best we expect is to show that there exists a Lipschitz function s ∞ defined on the unit sphere such that u(x, t) approaches, as t goes to infinity, the function…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…the initial data at (q(T ), ξ(T )) being nonnegative and sufficiently large so that v(T, r, Θ) ≥ |u i (T, r, Θ)|. Then, for any t ≥ T , q(t) ≥ 0 and ξ(t) ≥ 0 and we shall prove that v defined by (19) with ξ and q verifying (20) is a supersolution to (18). We have…”
Section: The O(t ε ) Estimatementioning
confidence: 91%
“…[2,9,31,36,37,55] for extinction/invasion results in terms of the size and/or the amplitude of the initial condition u 0 for various reaction terms f , and to [9,11,34,35,42] for general local convergence and quasiconvergence results at large time. For the invading solutions u (that is, those converging to 1 locally uniformly in R N as t → +∞) with localized initial conditions, further estimates on the location and shape at large time of the level sets have been established in [13,18,27,45,49,51,53]. Lastly, equations of the type (1.1) set in unbounded domains Ω instead of R N and notions of spreading speeds and persistence/invasion in such domains have been investigated in [5,50].…”
Section: Two Main Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%