2022
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2204881119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symmetry and asymmetry in biological structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Less information is required to describe bonding patterns that lead to higher symmetry, and thus such phenotypes have a higher probability of appearing upon random mutations [ 3 ]. One could imagine extending this preference for symmetry, modulated by processes such as symmetry breaking [ 71 ], to larger-scale developmental processes (see [ 72 , 73 ] for a discussion). In other cases, including the RNA secondary structures and branching morphologies (see ref [ 74 ]), different signatures of simplicity need to be employed to identify processes that can be described by shorter algorithms, which should be easier to find through random mutations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less information is required to describe bonding patterns that lead to higher symmetry, and thus such phenotypes have a higher probability of appearing upon random mutations [ 3 ]. One could imagine extending this preference for symmetry, modulated by processes such as symmetry breaking [ 71 ], to larger-scale developmental processes (see [ 72 , 73 ] for a discussion). In other cases, including the RNA secondary structures and branching morphologies (see ref [ 74 ]), different signatures of simplicity need to be employed to identify processes that can be described by shorter algorithms, which should be easier to find through random mutations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The false assumptions inevitably lead to the wrong unsolvable question. The collective labor of modern scientific society delivers evidence that space-time symmetry and relativity (STSR) are the fundamental properties of nature [17] and primary determinants of life [12,33]. The advances in quantum mechanics and group theory confirm the long-time-repining intuitive assumption, influencing the minds of the greatest scientists from Gailey to Dirac, that the principle of invariance (i.e., symmetry) is "analogous" to the relativity principle [34].…”
Section: Molecular Chiralitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hemispheric specialization is a crucial aspect of brain organization that supports human cognitive functions, including language and attention (Hartwigsen et al, 2021; Hervé et al, 2013; Ocklenburg & Mundorf, 2022; Toga & Thompson, 2003; Vallortigara & Rogers, 2020; Wan et al, 2022). Previous research has shown neuroanatomical differences between the left and right hemispheres at the macroscale (Amunts et al, 2003; Glasser et al, 2022; Goldberg et al, 2013; Kong et al, 2018; Kuo & Massoud, 2022; Sha et al, 2021; Williams et al, 2023).…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%