2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symmetry-Based Tight Binding Modeling of Halide Perovskite Semiconductors

Abstract: On the basis of a general symmetry analysis, this paper presents an empirical tight-binding (TB) model for the reference Pm-3m perovskite cubic phase of halide perovskites of general formula ABX. The TB electronic band diagram, with and without spin orbit coupling effect of MAPbI has been determined based on state of the art density functional theory results including many body corrections (DFT+GW). It affords access to various properties, including distorted structures, at a significantly reduced computationa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
83
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
4
83
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Spin-orbit coupling (SOC) is also included in the model, which adds two more parameters to the model, namely the SOC strengths for Pb and I. Treating the orbital energies and overlaps as fitting parameters, Boyer-Richard et al obtained system parameters that reproduce the main features in the electronic band structure of MAPbI 3 [21]. It is worth mentioning here that a recent study used a somewhat similar tight-binding model to investigate SOC effects in a different family of halide perovskite materials [22].…”
Section: Tight-binding Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Spin-orbit coupling (SOC) is also included in the model, which adds two more parameters to the model, namely the SOC strengths for Pb and I. Treating the orbital energies and overlaps as fitting parameters, Boyer-Richard et al obtained system parameters that reproduce the main features in the electronic band structure of MAPbI 3 [21]. It is worth mentioning here that a recent study used a somewhat similar tight-binding model to investigate SOC effects in a different family of halide perovskite materials [22].…”
Section: Tight-binding Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We take the model developed in Ref. [21], including the parameters obtained there, as the starting point for our calculations. This simplification allows us to perform systematic simulations on systems containing 512 unit cells (effectively containing ∼6000 atoms) at a rather low computational cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we take a major step in this direction via the formulation and theoretical investigation of a fully microscopic model describing the interplay between electronic structure and nuclear motion Our model aims to simulate very large system sizes and thus begins with a computationally efficient tight-binding (TB) parameterization of the band structure, as previously done, see, e.g., Refs. 26,27 . It includes real-space descriptions of the on-site energies associated with occupancy of the relevant s-and p-orbitals of Pb and I, as well as the kinetic energy arising from  and  overlaps of these orbitals, which determine the hopping parameters in the TB scheme.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approximation precludes a study of the Rashba effect, 25,26 arising from the inversion symmetry breaking of the typical orthorhombic structure, 7 although this effect could be straightforwardly included along the lines of Ref. 27. Henceforth, we will focus our attention on the specific case of layered HOIPs made from the popular parent compounds of ammonium or methylammonium (MA) lead iodide using butylammonium spacers, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 The spin-orbit coupling constants are determined to be ∆ Pb SOC = 1.18 eV and ∆ I SOC = 1.06 eV, which are similar to the values used in a previous tight-binding study. 27 Moving on to layered HOIPs, we model the system as a stack of alternating organic and inorganic slabs, each with a uniform dielectric constant as shown in Fig. 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%