2019
DOI: 10.1097/mca.0000000000000732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sympathectomy versus conventional treatment for refractory coronary artery spasm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current literature on its application to CAS is limited, but most of them implied the resolution of all symptoms without major complications. Lin et al [5] published the so far largest series that implied the reduction of major adverse cardiac event compared with the conventional treatment, which is consistent with previous reports.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Current literature on its application to CAS is limited, but most of them implied the resolution of all symptoms without major complications. Lin et al [5] published the so far largest series that implied the reduction of major adverse cardiac event compared with the conventional treatment, which is consistent with previous reports.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Thoracic chain resection was performed with VATS method in our patient because of the recurrence of CAVS despite all other therapies. Since 1980s, the sympathectomy has been shown to be successful in cases of resistant vasospastic angina (11). In a study, sympathectomy led to the resolution of all symptoms including pulseless electrical activity and cardiac arrest, and it was shown to prevent recurrence of angina and arrhythmia (12).…”
Section: Main Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study by Lin et al [ 84 ] shows another potential treatment option for refractory CAS—sympathectomy. The study showed that sympathectomy, compared to traditional CAS treatment, was more effective in protecting against a syndrome of episodes of a major adverse cardiac event and death.…”
Section: Management Of Coronary Artery Spasmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study showed that sympathectomy, compared to traditional CAS treatment, was more effective in protecting against a syndrome of episodes of a major adverse cardiac event and death. However, the authors emphasize that further studies are needed [ 84 ].…”
Section: Management Of Coronary Artery Spasmmentioning
confidence: 99%