1989
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.93.02040377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sympathomimetics in acute severe asthma: inhaled or parenteral, nebulizer or spacer?

Abstract: It is accepted today that all patients with acute asthma should be treated with a sympathomimetic, irrespective of previous therapy. This short review addresses the question of the optimal mode of administration of these drugs in acute severe asthma. Inhaled sympathomimetics are as effective as subcutaneous adrenaline, or intravenous salbutamol or terbutaline, and, as they produce fewer side-effects, are recommended as the best mode of administration. However, self-medication with a ready to use subcutaneous p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whatever the explanation, the clinical and functional improvement is dose-related. As emphasized by NosEDA and YERNAULT [1], the dose delivered by the inhaler is 10-20 times higher than that delivered by the nebulizer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Whatever the explanation, the clinical and functional improvement is dose-related. As emphasized by NosEDA and YERNAULT [1], the dose delivered by the inhaler is 10-20 times higher than that delivered by the nebulizer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…What is the explanation for the fai lure of low doses of beta-agonists and the success of higher ones? The authors of this review favour an inadequate mode of administration in some patients, and severe inflammation of the airway in others [1]. Even if we accept that a large proportion of asthmatic patients do not use inhalers correctly, it is hard to dismiss others, who have certainly learned how to use these devices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation