2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10711-021-00655-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symplectic 4-manifolds on the Noether line and between the Noether and half Noether lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The associated invariants of a compact complex surface of general type satisfy both the Bogomolov-Miayoka-Yau inequality 9χ h ≥ c 2 1 and the Noether inequality c 2 1 ≥ 2χ h − 6. Perhaps the most striking difference between the complex and symplectic geography is that the Noether inequality fails for symplectic 4-manifolds [22,14,1,41]. However, in this case, there are only sporadic examples realizing lattice points in the region 2a − 6 ≥ b > 0 as Lefschetz fibrations, which were suggested by Fintushel and Stern in [16]; see Remark 8.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The associated invariants of a compact complex surface of general type satisfy both the Bogomolov-Miayoka-Yau inequality 9χ h ≥ c 2 1 and the Noether inequality c 2 1 ≥ 2χ h − 6. Perhaps the most striking difference between the complex and symplectic geography is that the Noether inequality fails for symplectic 4-manifolds [22,14,1,41]. However, in this case, there are only sporadic examples realizing lattice points in the region 2a − 6 ≥ b > 0 as Lefschetz fibrations, which were suggested by Fintushel and Stern in [16]; see Remark 8.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%