2016
DOI: 10.1142/s2010326316500131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symplectic n-level densities with restricted support

Abstract: In this paper we demonstrate that the alternative form, derived by us in an earlier paper, of the n-level densities for eigenvalues of matrices from the classical compact group U Sp(2N ) is far better suited for comparison with derivations of the n-level densities of zeros in the family of Dirichlet L-functions associated with real quadratic characters than the traditional determinantal random matrix formula. Previous authors have found ingenious proofs that the leading order term of the n-level density of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was then resolved by Entin, Roditty-Gershon and Rudnick through zeta functions over function fields [8]. Recently, Mason and Snaith [15] presented an alternative proof of this result using a new formula for n-level densities of the random symplectic ensemble, analogous to the work of Conrey and Snaith in [5] and [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This was then resolved by Entin, Roditty-Gershon and Rudnick through zeta functions over function fields [8]. Recently, Mason and Snaith [15] presented an alternative proof of this result using a new formula for n-level densities of the random symplectic ensemble, analogous to the work of Conrey and Snaith in [5] and [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This approach was applied by Conrey and Snaith in [5] to study the one-level density function for zeros of quadratic Dirichlet L -functions. The general n -level density of the same family was examined by Mason and Snaith in [27], and further enabled them to show in [26] that the result agrees with the density conjecture when the Fourier transforms of test functions are supported in .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%