1966
DOI: 10.1128/mmbr.30.2.288-308.1966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symposium on replication of viral nucleic acids. 3. Replication of mengovirus ribonucleic acid.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1967
1967
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Attempts to detect single-stranded RNA in the enzyme reaction product. Generally, where the products formed by a virus-specific RNA polymerase have been examined, it was found that the enzyme catalyzed the synthesis of at least two species of RNA, a ribonuclease-resistant doublestranded form similar to that reported here and single-stranded progeny viral RNA (3, 11,24,27). Our failure to observe progeny RNA among the products of the SFV polymerase could have been due to: (i) deficiencies in our techniques for the preparation and assay of the enzyme and extraction of its products; (ii) degradation of viral RNA by ribonuclease contaminating the preparations; or (iii) the possibility that the synthesis of single-stranded viral RNA was the function of some enzymes other than the polymerase we have been examining.…”
Section: 70supporting
confidence: 55%
“…Attempts to detect single-stranded RNA in the enzyme reaction product. Generally, where the products formed by a virus-specific RNA polymerase have been examined, it was found that the enzyme catalyzed the synthesis of at least two species of RNA, a ribonuclease-resistant doublestranded form similar to that reported here and single-stranded progeny viral RNA (3, 11,24,27). Our failure to observe progeny RNA among the products of the SFV polymerase could have been due to: (i) deficiencies in our techniques for the preparation and assay of the enzyme and extraction of its products; (ii) degradation of viral RNA by ribonuclease contaminating the preparations; or (iii) the possibility that the synthesis of single-stranded viral RNA was the function of some enzymes other than the polymerase we have been examining.…”
Section: 70supporting
confidence: 55%
“…No decrease in activity was observed when phosphoenolpyruvate and pyruvate kinase were omitted from the reaction mixture, suggesting that an ATP-generating system is not required. This may be evidence that ATPases which are normally present in crudely prepared mitochondrial fractions were removed by sedimentation through 20% sucrose (25). The presence of 20 ,ug of actinomycin D per ml in the reaction failed to inhibit [3H]UMP incorporation, and therefore the possibility that the product was made from a DNA template is precluded.…”
Section: Absence Of An Rna-dependent Rna Polymer-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the latter cases, cellular RNA polymerase activity continued to be depressed during the period of virus growth, whereas with FPV there was a rise in DNA-dependent RNA polymerase activity between 1 and 3 hr after infection. That this rise was not due to a new RNA-dependent polymerase is suggested by the dependence of the observed activity on DNA template, ammonium, sulfate, and Mn+ ions, and its inhibition by actinomycin D, in contrast to the new virusinduced RNA polymerases described so far (18,20). Thus, we have no information at present to suggest that the increase in enzyme activity which we observed represents anything more than the enhancement of normal cellular enzyme activity, and it could be that this is the result of some nonspecific derangement of cellular metabolism in the virus-infected cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…There is a considerable body of information concerning the synthesis of virus-specific ribonucleic acid (RNA) in cells infected with small RNA viruses and RNA phages (18). Of the animal viruses, poliovirus and mengovirus have been particularly well studied, and it has been established that these viruses multiply within their host cells by inducing the formation of a virus-specific RNA synthesizing system in the cytoplasm, which is independent of the normal cell RNA synthesizing mechanism (20). In addition, it has been shown that the host cell nuclear deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-dependent RNA polymerase is inhibited shortly after infection with these viruses (2,14), and replaced by a new cytoplasmic RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%