2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2008.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symptom indicator of severity of depression in cancer patients: a comparison of the DSM-IV criteria with alternative diagnostic criteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our patients had a higher prevalence of clinical depression (25.7%) than those in other studies. Fewer needs for seeking information might reflect withdrawal and lack of interest in medical participation in depressed cancer patients [43]. The other explanation might be that depressed patients did not register needs for information to avoid receiving bad news and to preserve hope [44,45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our patients had a higher prevalence of clinical depression (25.7%) than those in other studies. Fewer needs for seeking information might reflect withdrawal and lack of interest in medical participation in depressed cancer patients [43]. The other explanation might be that depressed patients did not register needs for information to avoid receiving bad news and to preserve hope [44,45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…67,68 Certain items from the substitutive criteria like 'brooding, selfpity or pessimism' and 'cannot be cheered up, doesn't smile, no response to good news or funny situations' may be useful for detection of mild and severe depression, respectively, as has been found for cancer patients. 69 Beck Depression Inventory 58 which focuses on the cognitive aspects of depression may be a better suited instrument for assessment of depression in liver transplant candidates. It is a 21-item self-report instrument for measuring the presence and severity of depressive symptoms.…”
Section: Psychiatric Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three types of different approaches have been employed to identify depression among cancer patients: inclusive, exclusive, and substitutive approaches [13,14]. The inclusive approach includes all depressive symptoms regardless of whether or not the symptoms may be attributable to medical illness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modified DSM–IV Criteria uses this approach to identify depression. However, this approach has the tendency to over-diagnose patients who are medically ill with depression and causes false positive results due to its high sensitivity and lower specificity [13,14]. This was demonstrated by Kathol et al (1990), who found that the prevalence of depression in cancer patients dropped by 8% when comparing an inclusive approach with an etiologic approach that removes depressive symptoms attributed to cancer [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%