2000
DOI: 10.1006/mssp.1999.1246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symptom Reliability and Hazard for Systems Condition Monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, it is just ready to undertake the go/do not go diagnostic decision at the end of the bearing diagnostic test. This can be done by an operator or automatically, when applying the concept and calculation of symptom reliability and the symptom limit value S l (Cempel et al 2000;Natke, 2002;Cempel 1991).…”
Section: Examples Of Simple and Advanced Svd Decomposition Of Real DImentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this way, it is just ready to undertake the go/do not go diagnostic decision at the end of the bearing diagnostic test. This can be done by an operator or automatically, when applying the concept and calculation of symptom reliability and the symptom limit value S l (Cempel et al 2000;Natke, 2002;Cempel 1991).…”
Section: Examples Of Simple and Advanced Svd Decomposition Of Real DImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, we should determine the symptom limit value S l which enables us to do this safely. This limit value can base on some experimental practice, some standards (e.g., ISO), or it can be assessed by the new concept of symptom reliability R(S) (Natke, 1997;Cempel, 2000). Figure 7 shows this possibility of assessing the symptom limit value S l (the bottom-right panel), combined with another possibility of optimizing the dimension of the primary symptom observation space.…”
Section: Examples Of Simple and Advanced Svd Decomposition Of Real DImentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…E the observation matrix contains the lifetime-dependent symptom vectors, which permits information condensation via the SVD, E the SVD results in generalized fault/damage indicators, E in order to perform, for example, reliability investigations, one can relate one limit value [9] to each generalized fault/damage instead of relating a limit value to each symptom as in other techniques for monitoring and diagnosis, E the matrix elements of W (equation (33)) serve as symptom assurance criteria (SAC), E the non-zero SVs, ordered by their magnitudes, are fault/damage ranking indices, E the magnitudes of the SVs describe fault/damage intensities, E the small SVs are most sensitive to system modi"cations (and to measuring distortions), E the (directions of the) left singular vectors characterize the system modi"cations during lifetime of the system. However, the right singular vectors are more sensitive than the left singular vectors with respect to modi"cations.…”
Section: Application To Monitoring and Diagnostics: Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If no mathematical model of the system or its part with the detected modi"cation is available, reliability investigations [9] have to be performed based on the symptoms due to the test forces.…”
Section: Choice Of Test Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%