2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3312-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symptoms awareness, emergency medical service utilization and hospital transfer delay in myocardial infarction

Abstract: BackgroundThe length of time between symptom onset and reperfusion therapy in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a key determinant of mortality. Information on this delay is scarce, particularly for developing countries. The objective of the study is to prospectively evaluate the individual components of reperfusion time (RT) in patients with STEMI treated at a University Hospital in 2012.MethodsMedical records were reviewed to determine RT, its main (patient delay time [… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In several other studies, presenting directly to a tertiary facility significantly reduced mean treatment time versus those who were initially seen at a general hospital or by a primary clinician [19] , [20] , [21] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [34] , [35] , [37] , [41] . There was general agreement among studies that a lack of available reperfusion centers outside of major urban areas, limited diagnostic resources (EKG, cardiac enzymes) and adequately trained clinicians to recognize ACS prolonged symptom onset to treatment time [21] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [30] , [31] , [42] , [43] . In addition, system factors such as crowding in the emergency departments, and a lack of available bed capacity in reperfusion hospitals also contributed to major delays in treatment time [16] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In several other studies, presenting directly to a tertiary facility significantly reduced mean treatment time versus those who were initially seen at a general hospital or by a primary clinician [19] , [20] , [21] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [34] , [35] , [37] , [41] . There was general agreement among studies that a lack of available reperfusion centers outside of major urban areas, limited diagnostic resources (EKG, cardiac enzymes) and adequately trained clinicians to recognize ACS prolonged symptom onset to treatment time [21] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [30] , [31] , [42] , [43] . In addition, system factors such as crowding in the emergency departments, and a lack of available bed capacity in reperfusion hospitals also contributed to major delays in treatment time [16] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the current study, the duration of time from symptom onset to first medical contact ranged from less than 10 min [14] to 96 h [15] with a mean of 12.7 h. In three studies, the focus was the delay between arrival to the emergency department and treatment initiation [16] perceptions of treatment urgency for ACS symptoms [17] and the overall time delay to treatment [18] . Four studies reported that all patients sought medical contact within 12 h of symptom onset [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] , while 26 studies reported treatment delays of 12 h or more, of these, 7 studies showed that at least 50% of the study population were delayed for 12 h until the initial medical contact [15] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] . Only 1 study by Sharma and colleagues [29] targeted characteristics of patients arriving over 12-hours from symptom onset to treatment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the duration of time from symptom onset to reperfusion therapy, which includes patient delay, transfer delay, and in-hospital delay, is a crucial factor determining mortality in STEMI patients. The primary cause of delay in reperfusion is system delay 4 , which mainly comprises transfer delay. Compared with door-in-door-out patients, the door-toballoon time for patients who are directly transferred to emergency medical stations with in-hospital percutaneous coronary intervention capabilities is shorter and their prognosis is better 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%