2022 IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/ijcb54206.2022.10007950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SYN-MAD 2022: Competition on Face Morphing Attack Detection Based on Privacy-aware Synthetic Training Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in “SYN‐MAD‐2022″” at https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCB54206.2022.10007950, reference number [38]. The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in “HNU‐FM” at https://doi.org/10.1109/10.1109/ICEITSA54226.2021.00082, reference number [37].…”
Section: Data Availability Statementmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in “SYN‐MAD‐2022″” at https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCB54206.2022.10007950, reference number [38]. The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in “HNU‐FM” at https://doi.org/10.1109/10.1109/ICEITSA54226.2021.00082, reference number [37].…”
Section: Data Availability Statementmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…HNU‐FM [37] and SYN‐FACE [38] were chosen to evaluate the proposed ADFF. The HNU‐FM dataset is created based on facial landmarks, while the SYN‐FACE dataset is created based on GAN.…”
Section: Experiments and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus they can be considered to be challenging, similarly to other attack types, to be detected by the MADs. In general, the MixFaceNet-MAD performed slightly better than the Inception-MAD in most cases, whether to detect MorDIFF or other attacks, keeping in mind that this MAD (trained on SMDD) was the baseline for the recent SYN-MAD 2022 competition [22]. MoreDiff attacks seem to be also detected relatively better when the MADs are trained on the SMDD dataset.…”
Section: Fr Modelmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…IV. THE MORDIFF DATASET The MorDIFF dataset extends over the SYN-MAD 2022 competition dataset [22] and uses the same morphing pairs to enable a comparable dataset set. The MorDIFF and the SYN-MAD 2022 datasets are both based on the Face Research Lab London (FRLL) dataset [14].…”
Section: Diffusion-based Face Morphingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main candidate solutions for this issue is the use of synthetic data [8]. This has been very recently and successfully proposed for the training of face recognition [4,5,30] and morphing attack detection [9,11,21], among other processes such as model quantization [2]. Synthetic data for PAD development has, besides the privacy and legal motivations, a major advantage when it comes to scale and diversity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%