2007
DOI: 10.1002/dev.20250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synapses, circuits, and the ontogeny of learning

Abstract: This article summarizes the proceedings of a symposium organized by Mark Stanton and Pamela Hunt and presented at the annual meeting of the International Society for Developmental Psychobiology. The purpose of the symposium was to review recent advances in neurobiological and developmental studies of fear and eyeblink conditioning with the hope of discovering how neural circuitry might inform the ontogenetic analyses of learning and memory, and vice versa. The presentations were: (1) Multiple Brain Regions Con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…c). This is consistent with previous studies showing weaker retention of contextual fear conditioning for infant rats compared to juvenile and adult rats (Hunt et al, ; Rudy, ; Rudy & Morledge, ; Schiffino, Murawski, Rosen, & Stanton, ). It is important to note, however, that while PND17 rats do not show significant freezing to a context associated with presentation of a single footshock, more subtle indications of memory for the fear conditioning experience are present in these infant rats (Pisano et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…c). This is consistent with previous studies showing weaker retention of contextual fear conditioning for infant rats compared to juvenile and adult rats (Hunt et al, ; Rudy, ; Rudy & Morledge, ; Schiffino, Murawski, Rosen, & Stanton, ). It is important to note, however, that while PND17 rats do not show significant freezing to a context associated with presentation of a single footshock, more subtle indications of memory for the fear conditioning experience are present in these infant rats (Pisano et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Interestingly, those deficits were not present during the reversal learning task, which suggests the presence of cognitive flexibility in SCD mice. Animal and human studies indicate that intact hippocampal and cerebellar functions are required for normal cognitive learning and memory and that both spatial and reversal learning in the water T-maze are impaired after hippocampal lesions(Burgess et al, 2002; Gandhi et al, 2000; Hunt et al, 2007; Wang et al, 2011). However, during reversal learning, the striatum, frontal cortex, and nucleus accumbens neurons are engaged (Clarke et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, HPA activity has been shown to be reduced to only the second exposure to a stressor despite a long interval of time between the first and second exposures, suggesting some sort of memory trace produced by prior stress which can influence subsequent HPA activity (Armario, Valles, Dal-Zotto, Marquez, & Belda, 2004; Vogel & Jensh, 1988). Finally, habituation of HPA activity involves activation of distributed limbic circuitry (Herman, Figueiredo, Muller, Ulrich-Lai, Ostrander, Choi, and Cullinan, 2003) that overlaps with circuitry important for associative learning (Hunt, Fanselow, Richardson, Mauk, Freeman, & Stanton, 2007). Though direct tests of whether habituation of HPA activity relies on associative learning will be challenging to design, this idea must be addressed for a full understanding of adaptation of physiological and behavioral responses to repeated stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%