1978
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synaptic delay in the heart: an ionophoretic study.

Abstract: SUMMARY1. Neurotransmitters were applied ionophoretically to spontaneously beating clusters of ventricular muscle cells cultured from neonatal rats.2. Acetylcholine or its analogue carbachol produced hyperpolarization and decreased the rate of spontaneous beating. These responses had minimum latencies of about 250 msec and total durations of 6-12 sec.3. Noradrenaline, adrenaline or isoprenaline increased the rate of spontaneous beating. The minimum latency for this effect was 3-6 sec. Following a single brief … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum current change was reached about 5 s after the beginning of ACh application. Latency period as well as time to peak were very long compared to values described for the electrophysiological changes following ACh application by ionophoresis in other cardiac preparations (Hill-Smith & Purves, 1978;Osterrieder, Yang & Trautwein, 1981). In ourexperiments, little attention was paid to minimize the distance between the ACh-filled electrode and the fibre, so that diffusion of ACh from the electrode to and along the fibre may account for a great part of the long delays for ACh action.…”
Section: Effects Of Ach On 'Steady-state' Membrane Currentsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The maximum current change was reached about 5 s after the beginning of ACh application. Latency period as well as time to peak were very long compared to values described for the electrophysiological changes following ACh application by ionophoresis in other cardiac preparations (Hill-Smith & Purves, 1978;Osterrieder, Yang & Trautwein, 1981). In ourexperiments, little attention was paid to minimize the distance between the ACh-filled electrode and the fibre, so that diffusion of ACh from the electrode to and along the fibre may account for a great part of the long delays for ACh action.…”
Section: Effects Of Ach On 'Steady-state' Membrane Currentsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Although it is still not entirely clear if these responses are caused by a direct drug action on the membrane of the oocytes, similarly long delays (3-15 sec) have been observed following catecholamine application to heart cells (Niedergerke & Page, 1977;Hill-Smith & Purves, 1978).…”
Section: Onset Of Ach Action In Oocytesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miledi, unpublished). In contrast, the delay is several orders of magnitude longer in muscarinic receptors in various nerve and muscle cells, where the responses to ionophoretically applied ACh start with a delay varying from 150 msec to 30 sec (Krnjevic & Phillis, 1963;Bolton, 1976;Hartzell, Kuffler, Stickgold & Yoshikami, 1977;Hill-Smith & Purves, 1978).…”
Section: Onset Of Ach Action In Oocytesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It appears that BRS (the TF between 0.05 and 0.15 Hz) may lower with high sympathetic gain to the heart. This is caused by the differences in the latencies/time constants in the sympathetic (17,41) and vagal (6,48) limbs, bringing the vagal and the sympathetic effects in counterphase in the BRS frequency band. Hence, there are situations thinkable in which cancellation of vagal effects on heart rate by concurring sympathetic effects on heart rate in counterphase incorrectly suggest a deficient baroreflex.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, there are situations thinkable in which cancellation of vagal effects on heart rate by concurring sympathetic effects on heart rate in counterphase incorrectly suggest a deficient baroreflex. For higher frequencies, the influence of the sympathetic feedback gain weakens and disappears because of a low pass filtering effect caused by slow neurotransmitter diffusion at the synaptic clefts (17).…”
Section: Limitations Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%