“…For instance, either LTD of IPSPs or a change in excitability likely underlies the cases of E-S potentiation that have been reported to occur in the absence of LTP (Bliss and Lomo, 1973;Andersen et al, 1980;Abraham et al, 1985;Taube and Schwartzkroin, 1988;Jester et al, 1995). Nonetheless, whereas E-S potentiation is reliably observed in the hippocampus after tetanus-LTP, studies addressing the issue of tetanus-induced plasticity in the inhibitory branch of the disynaptic circuit have reported a variety of results (McLean et al, 1996;McBain and Maccaferri, 1997;McBain et al, 1999;Gaiarsa et al, 2002), ranging from no changes in inhibition , to LTP of IPSPs (Kairiss et al, 1987;Stelzer et al, 1994;Ouardez and Lacaille, 1995;Xie et al, 1995;Maccaferri and McBain, 1996;Cowan et al, 1998;Shew et al, 2000;Perez et al, 2001) to LTD of IPSPs (McMahon and Kauer, 1997;Lu et al, 2000;Chevaleyre and Castillo, 2003). Although we argue that inhibitory plasticity does not contribute to E-S potentiation when using a relatively mild pairing protocol, it may play a significant role under other induction protocols that more strongly engage the inhibitory circuitry.…”