-High-frequency stimulation is known to entrain spike activity downstream and upstream of several clinical deep brain stimulation (DBS) targets, including the cerebellar-receiving area of thalamus (VPLo), subthalamic nucleus (STN), and globus pallidus (GP). Less understood are the fidelity of entrainment to each stimulus pulse, whether entrainment patterns are stationary over time, and how responses differ among DBS targets. In this study, three rhesus macaques were implanted with a single DBS lead in VPLo, STN, or GP. Single-unit spike activity was recorded in the resting state in motor cortex during VPLo DBS, in GP during STN DBS, and in STN and pallidal-receiving area of motor thalamus (VLo) during GP DBS. VPLo DBS induced timelocked spike activity in 25% (n ϭ 15/61) of motor cortex cells, with entrained cells following 7.5 Ϯ 7.4% of delivered pulses. STN DBS entrained spike activity in 26% (n ϭ 8/27) of GP cells, which yielded time-locked spike activity for 8.7 Ϯ 8.4% of stimulus pulses. GP DBS entrained 67% (n ϭ 14/21) of STN cells and 32% (n ϭ 19/59) of VLo cells, which showed a higher fraction of pulses effectively inhibiting spike activity (82.0 Ϯ 9.6% and 86.1 Ϯ 16.6%, respectively). Latency of phase-locked spike activity increased over time in motor cortex (58%, VPLo DBS) and to a lesser extent in GP (25%, STN DBS). In contrast, the initial inhibitory phase observed in VLo and STN during GP DBS remained stable following stimulation onset. Together, these data suggest that circuit-level entrainment is low-pass filtered during high-frequency stimulation, most notably for glutamatergic pathways. Moreover, phase entrainment is not stationary or consistent at the circuit level for all DBS targets. deep brain stimulation; mechanisms; entrainment; peri-stimulus time histogram; subthalamic nucleus; globus pallidus; thalamus; motor cortex HIGH-FREQUENCY STIMULATION of subcortical structures, known as deep brain stimulation (DBS), has emerged in the past decades as a highly effective surgical therapy for medicationrefractory movement disorders and a promising therapy for numerous other neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders (Wichmann and DeLong 2006). Despite the clinical success, refinement of DBS remains hampered by the lack of clear mechanistic understanding of how DBS affects brain areas distal to the stimulated electrode(s) and how to modulate this activity in a consistent way to appropriately ameliorate specific symptoms.Computational modeling studies have suggested that DBS preferentially activates axonal efferents, afferents, and fibers of passage near the active electrode(s) McIntyre et al. 2004;Miocinovic et al. 2006) because axons, compared with cell bodies, have a lower threshold for generating action potentials with typical DBS waveforms Ranck 1975). Accordingly, electrophysiological studies have shown that high-frequency stimulation can generate phase-locked antidromic spike activity (i.e., spike activity that occurs at a specific phase of the interpulse interval) in regions that project to or...