2006
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2006.870731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synchronization at startup and stable rotation reversal of sensorless nonsalient PMSM drives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, at higher speeds, where back-EMF based sensorless algorithms can be utilized, the vanishing saliency does not pose any limitation and the unfeasible region could potentially be exploited when the rotor speed decreases. Another way of entering the unfeasible region can be to initiate sensorless operation from zero speed using sensorless algorithms not relying on signal injection but which can still handle an initial startup procedure, e.g., [28], [29]. 1) Optimization Procedure: Finding optimized operating points in the unfeasible region can be determined by relaxing…”
Section: Optimal Operating Points In the Unfeasible Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at higher speeds, where back-EMF based sensorless algorithms can be utilized, the vanishing saliency does not pose any limitation and the unfeasible region could potentially be exploited when the rotor speed decreases. Another way of entering the unfeasible region can be to initiate sensorless operation from zero speed using sensorless algorithms not relying on signal injection but which can still handle an initial startup procedure, e.g., [28], [29]. 1) Optimization Procedure: Finding optimized operating points in the unfeasible region can be determined by relaxing…”
Section: Optimal Operating Points In the Unfeasible Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To facilitate this transition at as low a speed as possible, it is vital to use a back-EMF-based method by which an asymptotically stable system is obtained for all speeds but standstill. 1 The stator resistance is the by far most sensitive parameter at low speeds; an inaccurate model stator resistance will often result in a large position error [10], [11], [12], and possibly even instability. Among the many publications on back-EMF-based methods for PMSMs [8], [10]- [30], only a few have proposed circumvention of this problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Because the back EMF vanishes at zero rotor speed, a back-EMF-based estimator by necessity becomes "blind," and as a consequence marginally stable, at standstill. and stator-resistance observer-whereas [11] proposes usage of the instantaneous reactive power.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the back electromotive force (EMF) is proportional to the rotational speed of the motor, parameter errors have a relatively high effect on the accuracy of the estimated back EMF at low speeds [4]. Improper observer gain selections may cause unstable operation of the drive even if the parameters are accurately known [3], [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%