2019
DOI: 10.1109/lcsys.2019.2916249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synchronization in Networks of Identical Nonlinear Systems via Dynamic Dead Zones

Abstract: In this paper, we consider the problem of synchronization of a network of nonlinear systems with high-frequency noise affecting the exchange of information. We modify the classic (linear) diffusive coupling by adding dynamic dead zones with the aim of reducing the impact of the noise. We show that the proposed redesign preserves asymptotic synchronization if the noise is not active and we establish a desired ISS property. Simulation results show that, in the presence of noise, the dynamic dead zones highly imp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figures 1 and 2 showcase the transient behavior of the state variables and corresponding estimates in two different simulation runs, i.e., in a noise-free case and under the presence of random noises. Such simulation runs show that the time response of the observer is less than the oscillation period of the oscillators, namely it converges quite quickly in such a way as to feed the possible close-loop controllers with the estimates for the purpose of syncronization (see [47] and the references therein). The behaviors at the regime can be analyzed by looking at Figures 3 and 4.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figures 1 and 2 showcase the transient behavior of the state variables and corresponding estimates in two different simulation runs, i.e., in a noise-free case and under the presence of random noises. Such simulation runs show that the time response of the observer is less than the oscillation period of the oscillators, namely it converges quite quickly in such a way as to feed the possible close-loop controllers with the estimates for the purpose of syncronization (see [47] and the references therein). The behaviors at the regime can be analyzed by looking at Figures 3 and 4.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, the developed result can be easily extended to this case via replacing Γ1,x^,ki=ξijMilij(x^pj,rjx^pj,ri) by Γ1,x^,ki,ρ=ξijMilijρi(x^pj,rjx^pj,ri) in Theorem 1. On the other hand, different from the dependence of the whole Laplacian matrix in the literatures, 44,45 the desired parameter Kki in our article is implicitly related with the local communication topology, that is, the i th row of the Laplacian matrix. In other words, the Laplacian matrix combined with the received neighboring estimates (i.e., the term Γ1,x^,ki) definitely affects the volume of the estimated ellipsoid (x^k+1i,Pk+1i).…”
Section: Design Of Distributed Stubborn‐set‐membership Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it should be pointed out that the conception of artificial stubborn constraint comes from that in the literatures. 40,44,45 Especially, a novel approach of dynamic saturation redesign with an adaptive rule has been developed in the literatures 44,45 to realize the synchronization of complex dynamical systems while mitigating the impact of impulsive perturbations. In these two articles, the developed results clearly disclose the influence from the connection topology benefiting from the utilization of the approaches of steady-state performance analysis and therefore it is of crucial importance to investigate the distributed filtering issues under the worst case with a common parameter K and shape matrix P.…”
Section: Parameter Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, we propose two different methodologies to redesign the output injection term, both of them preserving ISS. The first one, called stubborn redesign, was first introduced in the context of linear systems [5], [6], and high-gain observers [9], and aftewards used in Kalman filters [26], neural networks [35] and synchronization [21], [22]. It consists in adding an adaptive saturation to the output injection error in the observer dynamics so as to reduce the sensitivity to measurement outliers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%