2018
DOI: 10.1111/ejn.13905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synchronization in the prefrontal–striatal circuit tracks behavioural choice in a go–no‐go task in rats

Abstract: Rodent striatum is involved in sensory-motor transformations and reward-related learning. Lesion studies suggest dorsolateral striatum, dorsomedial striatum and nucleus accumbens underlie stimulus-response transformations, goal-directed behaviour and reward expectation, respectively. In addition, prefrontal inputs likely control these functions. Here, we set out to study how reward-driven behaviour is mediated by the coordinated activity of these structures in the intact brain. We implemented a discrimination … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Rotarod training induced a transient decrease in the DMS response to cortical stimulation after early training. This is in apparent contradiction with previous recordings in DMS showing an increase in activity (Nonomura et al, 2018;Thorn et al, 2010;Yin et al, 2009), but recent publications have also highlighted an inhibition in DMS during the early phase of operant conditioning, particularly during lever-press sequences ( Vandaele et al, 2019) and discrimination (Stubbendorff et al, 2019) tasks. Even though this could be interpreted as a disengagement of DMS, global inhibition could be a mechanism to reveal HA cells and increase the signal-to-noise ratio in the corticostriatal DMS network.…”
Section: Dynamic Network Reorganization In Dms and Dlscontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…Rotarod training induced a transient decrease in the DMS response to cortical stimulation after early training. This is in apparent contradiction with previous recordings in DMS showing an increase in activity (Nonomura et al, 2018;Thorn et al, 2010;Yin et al, 2009), but recent publications have also highlighted an inhibition in DMS during the early phase of operant conditioning, particularly during lever-press sequences ( Vandaele et al, 2019) and discrimination (Stubbendorff et al, 2019) tasks. Even though this could be interpreted as a disengagement of DMS, global inhibition could be a mechanism to reveal HA cells and increase the signal-to-noise ratio in the corticostriatal DMS network.…”
Section: Dynamic Network Reorganization In Dms and Dlscontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…A recent study indicates that PrL and striatal activity is associated with responses to reward predicting cues, in particular if failures to respond occur. The authors propose that cue‐related experience‐dependent changes in PrL activity are induced by striatal feedback to cortex (Stubbendorff et al ., ), that is by the thalamo‐cortical input to layer 1.…”
Section: Prefrontal Cortex In Decision‐makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the DMS is preferentially connected with the mPFC, and mostly involved in the associations between responses and outcomes and the motivational control of goal-directed actions. In contrast, the DLS receives sensorimotor information from the respective cortical areas, and is more related to the proper formation of skilled movements and motor habits by the appropriate association between stimuli and responses (Stalnaker et al, 2010; Graybiel and Grafton, 2015; Corbit and Janak, 2016; Lipton et al, 2019; Stubbendorff et al, 2019; Vandaele et al, 2019). Based on simultaneous unitary recordings from PrL and dorsal striatum neurons, Stubbendorff et al (2019) propose that this functional network also underlies reward-related decisions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%